Skip to main content

B.C. Finance Minister Mike de Jong tables the provincial budget in the Legislative Assembly on June 27, 2013, in Victoria.

Chad Hipolito/The Canadian Press

The B.C. government has vowed to hit its target of slaying the deficit this year even as the economy softens.

With a surprise and decisive election victory behind her, Premier Christy Clark presented her vision Thursday for leaner government, low personal taxes and job growth fuelled by natural resource development.

Economic growth projections have been trimmed, to 1.4 per cent from 1.6, meaning $30-million in budget cuts are on the way over the next nine months. Even then, the surplus target of $153-million sits on a knife's edge.

Story continues below advertisement

Compared with the pre-election budget plan tabled in February, this week's version offers a decidedly less rosy picture of the province's fiscal state.

With Ms. Clark sitting with other guests in the House – she has yet to win a seat – Finance Minister Mike de Jong delivered the budget in an unconventional presentation that featured key data displayed on large flat screens temporarily mounted on the marble walls.

He warned the government will have to be vigilant to deliver a surplus in the face of sluggish job growth, slowing retail sales, and sputtering housing starts.

But the B.C. Liberal government, which owes its fourth consecutive majority win in May in part to a campaign that promised fiscal restraint, had to present a budget in the black.

"British Columbians had a choice," Mr. de Jong told the legislature. "They said 'yes' to balanced budgets. They said 'yes' to disciplined spending."

It is the debt picture that is most troubling for Ms. Clark's government. After a campaign in which she promised to slay the debt, the province's obligations are growing faster than the expansion of the economy.

Compared with the February blueprint, the new plan adds another $630-million to the debt over the next three years. Just one Crown corporation alone, BC Hydro, accounts for an additional $440-million in spending on capital projects for this fiscal year due to cost overruns and new developments.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's time this government began to fret our debt, both within the legislature and at the Crown corporations," said Jordan Bateman, B.C. director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

Mike Farnworth, the NDP finance critic, insisted the budget is not credibly balanced, resting as it does on substantial asset sales. And he said the declining employment growth forecasts are an embarrassment for a government that has made job creation its top priority.

"People are leaving B.C. for Alberta and other places with stronger economies," Mr. Farnworth told the House. "Repeating slogans over and over doesn't make it so … The government jobs plan is failing."

The February budget wasn't passed into law, because the legislature was dissolved for the May 14 election. The new budget is based on the same framework, and is key to setting the tone for government now that Ms. Clark has secured her first mandate from B.C. voters, after winning her party's leadership two years ago. The Premier lost her seat in the election, and is now running in a by-election in a safe Liberal seat in the Interior.

The bottom line of the fiscal plan – which mirrors Ms. Clark's campaign mantra – is to wipe out the deficit and wrestle down the ever-expanding costs for health-care spending. The plan is to take B.C. from a $1.1-billion deficit in the past fiscal year to a surplus. That requires a growing economy, spending restraint, higher taxes for business and high-income earners, and asset sales.

However the "debt-free B.C." plan can't be found in the budget – it is based on the creation of a liquefied natural gas sector that is still years away from reality.

Story continues below advertisement

Speaking to reporters, Mr. de Jong said he was troubled to learn of the cost overruns that have emerged on several BC Hydro projects – something the Crown corporation's board only learned a few weeks ago. But he could shed no light on how that will be managed. Nor could he say where additional savings in government will be found.

"No argument from me that what we are talking about is a balancing act that requires attention to detail," Mr. de Jong said. "Finding efficiencies in government is an ongoing process."

---------------------------------------

B.C. budget by the numbers

$153-million: Projected surplus in 2013-14 (down from $197-million in February budget)

$62.5-billion: Total province debt in 2013-14

Story continues below advertisement

$9,121: Taxpayer-supported debt per capita

18.5%: Taxpayer-supported debt-to-GDP ratio in 2014-15 (from 18.3 per cent in 2013/14)

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter