Skip to main content

Ocean debris believed to be from Japan is seen on Long Beach in Tofino, B.C., on April, 18, 2012. A species of mussel is believed to have hitchhiked on debris from the 2011 tsunami to Canadian waters.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

A sea creature at risk of going extinct in Asia is proving to be a survivor, but after an arduous ocean journey it's not welcome to find safe haven in British Columbia.

A non-indigenous mussel that likely hitchhiked its way across the Pacific ocean has been discovered on suspected tsunami debris from Japan's 2011 earthquake.

The federal Fisheries Department has identified the species as a mussel called Mytilus coruscus, and said it "has not conducted a full risk assessment." It said the creature arrived on a single piece of debris and is believed to have originated in Japan, but would not provide further details.

Story continues below advertisement

So far, the mussel appears to be the only "hitchhiker" verified as making an international arrival following the East Asia catastrophe that created a massive surge of water, casting about five million tonnes of debris into the sea.

Scientists predicted some of the wreckage would eventually turn up on B.C. shores, although provincial environment officials now say the volume has been lower than anticipated.

About 70 per cent of the debris sank off the Japanese coast, leaving 1.5 million tonnes to be dispersed by ocean currents, sink elsewhere or be swirled into giant garbage gyres.

"We believe that the greatest risk for major debris has passed," said an e-mail from the Environment Ministry.

But officials did single out the mussel survivor, which marine life experts say is a situation that should be taken seriously.

The species likely turned up on floating driftwood or some other surface it could cling to. But that also signals a possibility it could have entered Canadian waters, said Paul Valentich-Scott, a mollusk specialist in California.

Precautions should always be taken when a new creature surfaces in an unfamiliar environment, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

"Think of weeds in your yard. If they're let go, they'll take over everything," said Valentich-Scott with the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. "That's exactly what happens with introduced invasive species. It takes over all the available space and pushes everything out."

However, he believes that would be the worst case scenario and doesn't expect such trouble likely with this particular species.

A survey of several prominent B.C. aquatic centres turned up no experts familiar with the mussel.

But a 2012 study in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, forwarded by the Vancouver Aquarium, sheds some light. It describes Mytilus coruscus as the "most favoured commercially" among about 20 mussel species in Korea, inhabiting the coastal areas of Eastern Asia including Korea, Japan and China.

"During the past few decades, this species has become endangered due to the loss of habitats and overfishing," the paper says.

The Fisheries Department said the federal government has an action plan to address the threat of aquatic invasive species, but did not specify how it applies.

Story continues below advertisement

A joint committee set up manage tsunami debris issues was the first to identify the stowaway mussel as a potential concern.

In draft minutes released to The Canadian Press under access to information laws, a bullet point suggests the debris with "isolated potential invasive species" surfaced in Ucluelet, on Vancouver Island's West coast.

William Austin, director of the Khoyatan Marine Laboratory on Vancouver Island, said it's not uncommon for non-native species to show up in coastal waters.

He said it may be a good idea to conduct surveys along the coast to track whether the mussel has latched onto any other new homes.

"Just recording all this stuff doesn't get you very far, necessarily," he said. "My own feeling is this is one of the things you want people in government to be able to be involved in."

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter