Skip to main content

A ship receives its load of oil from the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain expansion project’s Westeridge loading dock in Burnaby, B.C.

Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press

Kinder Morgan's proposed pipeline expansion is caught amidst a "challenging" time of transition, from the country's shift to a low-carbon economy to court victories that have reshaped First Nations' land claims, says an appointee to a federal ministerial panel gathering community reaction to the $6.8-billion plan.

Kim Baird, one of three members of the advisory panel, made the point Tuesday in Vancouver during a break in public hearings examining the controversial expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline between the Alberta oil sands and Burnaby, B.C.

The panel was appointed by the Liberal government to conduct additional work even after the National Energy Board recommended approval, with conditions.

Story continues below advertisement

During Tuesday's hearing, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson launched a blunt attack on the proposal, raising concerns about the financial, social and environmental cost of a possible spill linked to either the expanded pipeline or increased tanker traffic it would generate.

In an interview, Ms. Baird, a former chief of the Tsawwassen First Nation near Vancouver, acknowledged the ongoing debate.

"I think it's an extremely challenging time for any project [given] what seems to be changing goal posts," she said.

"The debate it triggers is, I think, reflective of the transition Canada is going to be in, in the foreseeable future from what I can observe."

Ms. Baird noted the pipeline proposal is being debated at a time of change, including the election of a federal government committed to revamping the environmental assessment process to regain public trust, as well as case law evolving on the issues of First Nations' rights and title.

However, she did not take a stand on the project. She noted the panel, appointed by Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr, is focused on gathering community input on the previous National Energy Board review and determining whether there are things the NEB process did not examine adequately.

"It's not my job to agree or disagree; it's to relay the public's view to the minister," she said. "It's not in our terms of reference to make recommendations or a decision on this project."

Story continues below advertisement

The NEB review concluded with the approval of the expansion of the oil pipeline subject to 157 conditions.

But Mr. Carr established the panel, which is to come up with a report ahead of the federal cabinet reaching a final decision on the project by Dec. 19.

Ms. Baird said themes emerging in the hearings include the sense that the scope of the NEB process didn't adequately assess spill risk or climate change, and First Nations' concerns that consultation has been inadequate.

She said it appears the public is welcoming the opportunity to be heard by the panel and that their comments have been enlightening, though she did not elaborate on specifics Tuesday. "There's usually some kernels we get every meeting."

She said it will be up to Mr. Carr to decide on the release of the panel's report.

The City of Vancouver has launched a court challenge to quash the NEB's recommended approval, joining other groups, including environmentalists and First Nations, who have launched legal attacks.

Story continues below advertisement

On Tuesday, Mr. Robertson came to the hearing to further present his concerns. Once again, the mayor said the NEB process was flawed and biased, and the pipeline is too risky for the city, region and Canada.

Following the proceedings, Mr. Robertson predicted a "huge impact" on support for the Liberals on the West Coast if they approve the pipeline.

Asked whether federal approval of the pipeline expansion would damage a robust relationship with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau – who, in December was the first sitting prime minister since his father in the 1970s to visit Vancouver City Hall – the mayor said he had faith Ottawa would make the "right decision" and find other solutions to support Alberta's needs given the challenges that province is facing due to the declining cost of oil.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies