Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Amrik Virk has been moved to lead the Ministry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services, replacing Andrew Wilkinson.

CHAD HIPOLITO/The Globe and Mail

Premier Christy Clark has shuffled her cabinet, moving Amrik Virk out of his advanced education portfolio on the same day an updated report revealed that the minister was fully knowledgeable about a compensation package that broke government guidelines.

The premier's office said Thursday that Virk was swapped into leading the Ministry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens' Services, replacing Andrew Wilkinson who will take up the Advanced Education post.

The Opposition New Democrats quickly asserted Virk should be "fired, not shuffled," a month after their members brought e-mails to the legislature's attention that document Virk's role and prompted a second review.

Story continues below advertisement

Virk was not an elected official when he sat on the board of Kwantlen Polytechnic University.

"Mr. Virk, in my opinion, was completely dishonest about the level of his involvement in this scheme," said NDP critic David Eby, who was leaked two packages of documents illustrating Virk's involvement.

"He misled the house and then he misled an investigator assigned by his own government. ... That's totally unacceptable conduct."

In a report released in June, deputy minister Rob Mingay found that Virk was vice-chair of the school's board when it failed to meet government disclosure requirements around compensation for two senior executives. Virk stood up in the house and denied knowing about the rules.

But then last month, Eby presented new e-mails to the legislature that appeared to show Virk clearly knew about a plan to top up the salary of former Kwantlen vice-president Anne Lavack.

The revelations prompted Finance Minister Mike de Jong to request Mingay to examine the new material, determine whether it altered the findings of fact, and issue an update.

"Given the low pay level of a VPA [vice-president academic] at Kwantlen and the difficulty in drawing candidates within the current pay scale, the research leave is one way to 'top' off the pay level. This is a common practice that I learned of and spoke to several Board chairs...," reads one April 11, 2011 e-mail from Virk to five board members.

Story continues below advertisement

The e-mail was among a series of board members' disclosures that have now been added to the initial report by Mingay, who said he has subsequently revised his conclusions.

Mingay also added that Lavack was offered a salary of $170,000 annually at its ceiling, $100,000 towards moving expenses, a $20,000 research allowance and that "any amount left over after expenses" would be paid out as a lump-sum taxable signing bonus.

He found the review revealed "certain members" of the then-Board of Governors, some administrative staff and the search consultant knew of the Lavack offer letter and pre-employment contract, Mingay said in a letter released by the provincial government.

"The change to the conclusion only serves to reinforce the importance of the recommendations in my original report," Mingay said in the letter he sent to de Jong on Monday.

Virk was unavailable for comment, but in a statement said it was an honour to take over the portfolio while making no mention of the controversy.

"I look forward to immediately beginning the work of supporting the services necessary for a well-functioning democratic system," Virk said.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies