Skip to main content

The case of the Mountie who was suspended for close to seven years while collecting full salary has critics renewing calls for the RCMP's cumbersome disciplinary procedures to be streamlined.

"It boggles the mind that a process could last this long," David Eby, executive director of the BC Civil Liberties Association, said Tuesday, referring to the time it took the RCMP to dole out discipline to Constable James Douglas MacLeod.

"This is the longest delay that I've ever heard of, but it's a familiar song and a very familiar situation," Mr. Eby said. "Somebody's going to have to step up, and I hope it's [RCMP] Commissioner [Bob] Paulson."

Story continues below advertisement

In a frank open letter issued earlier this year, Commissioner Paulson pledged to work to change a discipline system that he acknowledged was outdated by 25 years.

But so far, the government has not moved to make necessary changes to the RCMP Act. As well, the latest report by the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP noted that many disciplinary cases before Commissioner Paulson for final dispensation have been outstanding for more than six months.

"You'd think if the RCMP was frustrated by the delays, they'd be working to the max to fulfill their duties in a timely way, and that's just not happening," Mr. Eby said. "It's not only the public that says [cases like this] are outrageous, individual RCMP members are saying they want matters resolved in a reasonable time, too."

Rob Gordon, director of the school of criminology at Simon Fraser University, said internal RCMP disciplinary procedures include innumerable mechanisms and diversions along the way that seem to turn the entire matter into a neverending process. "It's like the writhing of snakes around and around."

What really annoys people is that those under investigation, like Constable MacLeod, receive their full salary regardless, Prof. Gordon said. "He's the only person who benefits [from the process]. Meanwhile, we all pay. It's ridiculous."

Constable MacLeod was finally forced off the force this summer, over an incident of alleged sexual assault that took place in late 2005. During the long time in between, he was suspended with pay. Criminal charges against him were stayed by the Crown in 2008.

Now, the former RCMP officer has applied to the Federal Court of Canada for a judicial review of the decision to dismiss him, alleging that Commissioner Paulson, who upheld the penalty, based his ruling on an erroneous finding of fact that was made "in a perverse or capricious manner."

Story continues below advertisement

Prof. Gordon likened the MacLeod matter to the notoriety surrounding the case of Monty Robinson, the Mountie who was suspended with full pay for four years, after he was accused of obstruction of justice for trying to cover up his consumption of alcohol before his involvement in a fatal accident. Mr. Robinson resigned from the RCMP just before he was sentenced.

"No other jurisdiction would get away with this kind of system," Prof. Gordon said, adding that he believes Commissioner Paulson is as frustrated as anyone.

"From everything he's said, he's hellbent on changing it.… These kind of cases should be able to be resolved in a matter of months, not years."

The RCMP did not respond Tuesday to a request for comment on the MacLeod case.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter