Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The suggestion that Grand Chief Ed John step down reflects tension between First Nations groups and B.C.’s children’s ministry, which has for years grappled with the high numbers of aboriginal children in care.

Bernardo De Niz/The Globe and Mail

First Nations leader Ed John is facing calls to resign from his role as adviser on aboriginal child welfare to the British Columbia government amid the fallout from a review that recommended the province phase out its independent children's watchdog.

The suggestion that Mr. John step down reflects tension between First Nations groups and B.C.'s children's ministry, which has for years grappled with the high numbers of aboriginal children in care.

B.C. has about 8,000 kids in government care, and about 50 per cent of them are aboriginal – even though indigenous people make up only about 4.5 per cent of the population.

Story continues below advertisement

In September, the province named Mr. John a senior adviser on aboriginal child welfare for a six-month term. He is also on the executive of the First Nations Summit, a group set up to pursue treaty negotiations in B.C.

"While there is a great deal of respect for Grand Chief Ed John, he should consider stepping away from his role as advisor to the [Ministry of Children and Family Development]," Cheam First Nation Chief Ernie Crey said Wednesday on his Facebook page.

Plecas Review Report Part One

"The Plecas report and its recommendations constitute a danger to the many thousands of Aboriginal children in B.C. government care. The Grand Chief should not let his good name be sullied by the cynical manoeuvrings of the [Liberal Premier Christy] Clark government," Mr. Crey added.

Mr. Crey was referring to a report released this week on B.C.'s child-welfare system written by former civil servant Bob Plecas.

The report suggested, among other things, folding the office of B.C.'s Representative for Children and Youth into the ministry.

That independent position, created in 2006 after an investigation into the children's ministry, is held by Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, who has issued reports that have harshly criticized the ministry, including some that have focused on aboriginal children.

To Mr. Crey, the suggestion could herald an unwelcome shift in how the province approaches aboriginal child-care issues and puts Mr. John in an untenable position.

Story continues below advertisement

"He can ill afford to have his name, in any respect, associated with Mr. Plecas and his report and its recommendations," Mr. Crey said in an interview.

"If he wants to go to work for the ministry, great. But if he wants to continue to be a voice and advocate for the aboriginal community, then the aboriginal community will need him 100 per cent."

Mr. John was out of town and not immediately available for comment.

Mr. John signed a Dec. 14 letter to Ms. Clark from the First Nations Leadership Council – which includes the First Nations Summit – that called the Plecas report "a wasted opportunity to effect the positive change so desperately needed in B.C."

First Nations Health Council chairman Doug Kelly echoed Mr. Crey's concerns, saying Mr. John has been caught in a clash between First Nations' interests and the province over how best to reduce the number of aboriginal children in government care.

"He [Mr. John] is in a battle, and he's trying to play on both sides of the battlefield," Mr. Kelly said. "He is on the payroll of the First Nations Summit. He's also on the payroll of the [ministry] for that contract. We're engaged in conflict. … He can't play on both sides."

Story continues below advertisement

Cheryl Casimer, also an executive of the First Nations Summit, rejected the suggestion that Mr. John was in a conflict, saying Mr. Plecas's report does not affect his mandate.

"The scope of work that Grand Chief Ed John is doing is bigger than a report commissioned from an ex-deputy minister," Ms. Casimer said, adding that Mr. John was unavailable for comment because he was in a First Nations community to talk about child-welfare concerns.

"If people are going to be saying he is in a conflict, that conversation should have taken place when Grand Chief Ed John presented his appointment to the [the First Nations Summit]," Ms. Casimer said. "That was the time for a conversation and discussion around it."

Mr. John's appointment coincides with increasing calls to stem the flow of aboriginal children into state care. In its final report, tabled this month, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which looked at the legacy of Canada's residential school system, began its list of calls to action with steps related to child welfare.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies