Skip to main content

Finance Minister Mike de Jong said the Liberal government plans to introduce two separate pieces of legislation focusing on LNG — taxes and emissions reporting

Chad Hipolito/The Globe and Mail

The issue of a liquefied natural gas tax is set to heat up debate during British Columbia's fall legislative session, but the potentially controversial issue of emissions controls is also part of the package.

Finance Minister Mike de Jong said the Liberal government plans to introduce two separate pieces of legislation focusing on LNG — taxes and emissions reporting.

De Jong said the tax legislation will be tabled within the next two weeks and the emissions reporting bill is due in late October.

Story continues below advertisement

He said the primary focus of the legislative session starting Monday will be the introduction and debate of the proposed LNG laws. A template of a proposed two-tier tax was introduced in last February's budget.

Premier Christy Clark has sold the LNG industry as a potential generator of a trillion-dollar economic opportunity that could create up to 100,000 jobs. She promised to devote royalties from the industry to create a prosperity fund that would fuel projects and wipe out the province's debt, currently at more than $60 billion.

There are more than a dozen LNG projects in the proposal stages in B.C., but the companies have yet to make their final decisions on investment.

Several major companies, including Malaysian energy giant Petronas, which is part of a multibillion-dollar LNG proposal near Prince Rupert, have said they need to see the government's taxation plan.

Clark met with Petronas chief executive officer Shamsul Abbas on Tuesday, with officials describing the meeting as "cordial."

"These are sizable investments with a lot at stake for the citizens of B.C. and the proponents and we want to get it right," de Jong said in an interview.

He said much of the negotiations have focused on finding a tax figure that is good for the industry and provides benefits to the province.

Story continues below advertisement

"There's certainly been discussion around the overall cost structure," he said.

"We're also mindful of who owns the resource that lies at the heart of this process. That's the citizens of B.C. They deserve a fair return as well."

An oil and gas industry analyst said B.C.'s tax announcement is being eagerly awaited by the energy industry.

"You really don't get total certainty until you get certainty in all of the financial drivers," said Deloitte's Calgary-based oil and gas analyst Geoff Hill. "The sooner the B.C. government can come up with a very predictable and concrete tax rate, whether it's a carbon tax, an LNG tax or an income tax, I think that'll be positive."

He said companies can crunch their numbers and make investment decisions once the tax announcement is made.

"A company is interested in knowing what the federal tax is, the municipal tax, the provincial tax, the carbon tax, the environmental tax. They have to add all those up to their cost of doing business in the region. If one or more of those are uncertain then it's not good."

Story continues below advertisement

He said a low, predictable and consistent tax rate is what industry wants.

De Jong said calls by industry for tax relief are expected.

"If you ask a proponent what level of taxation they would like to pay, the most honest among them would say zero," de Jong said. "Folks are going to advocate in the best interests of the organization they represent. The organization we represent is the taxpayers of British Columbia."

De Jong said that an emissions-reporting scheme would also be legislated, but he refused to elaborate.

The Environment Ministry said in a statement that the "government is working to ensure any LNG facilities built in B.C. are the cleanest in the world. The province plans to bring legislation forward in the fall to make this a reality."

In July, Clark told an international conference at Whistler that selling LNG from B.C. to China will reduce greenhouse gas pollution worldwide because it will lessen China's dependence on coal as an energy source.

Story continues below advertisement

Clark said she remains committed to meeting B.C.'s legislated greenhouse gas reduction targets to one-third less emissions by 2020.

Environmental groups say plans to allow the proposed LNG plants to run on natural gas rather than electricity will increase greenhouse gas emissions at home.

Pembina Institute spokesman Matt Horne said the government's environmental component of the LNG legislation must address carbon pollution at all levels of the process — from terminals, to pipelines and the extraction of shale gas.

"I think this legislation will be a good test of how serious they are," Horne said.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter