Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

From left, Peter Lantin, president of the Haida First Nation, Ellis Ross, Chief Councillor of the Haisla First Nation and Clarence Innis, acting chief councillor for the Gitxaala First Nation, stand together at aa news conference in Vancouver on Monday. Eight groups challenged the Northern Gateway pipeline on Monday.

DARRYL DYCK/The Globe and Mail

A new wave of court actions has been filed in relation to the Northern Gateway project, adding to the legal challenges dogging the $7.9-billion proposal and raising more questions about if and when it will proceed.

The latest lawsuits also underscore the significance of a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision related to B.C.'s Tsilhqot'in Nation, which confirmed the group holds aboriginal title to a specific tract of land in the province and is being used as a springboard for new actions challenging Ottawa's approval of Northern Gateway.

On Monday, the Gitxaala Nation and seven other groups, including the Council of the Haida Nation and the Heiltsuk Tribal Council, announced that they had filed for leave to apply for judicial review of the federal government's approval of Northern Gateway.

Story continues below advertisement

Under regulatory changes introduced last year, opponents seeking to overturn federal cabinet decisions through a judicial review must first seek leave from the Federal Court of Appeal. The deadline to do so was Monday.

"The Gitxaala Nation has followed all the rules," Gitxaala acting chief Clarence Innis said at a press conference in Vancouver where First Nation groups had gathered to announce the court actions.

"We were involved with the Joint Review Panel, we provided evidence, we expressed concerns … those were all ignored. Canada has a duty to consult and that hasn't happened."

Other court actions were under way before the government issued its conditional approval for Northern Gateway in June. In January, five groups – including B.C. Nature – filed lawsuits challenging the recommendation of the Joint Review Panel that recommended to government that Northern Gateway should proceed.

Those cases are in progress.

In all, about a dozen court challenges related to Northern Gateway are under way, raising the possibility of months of court disputes.

One of the groups that announced legal action Monday was the Gitga'at First Nation, which says its ancestral territory takes in about 7,500 square kilometres of land and water including part of Douglas Channel, the proposed route for Northern Gateway tankers.

Story continues below advertisement

As well as seeking leave to apply for judicial review, the Gitga'at First Nation – emboldened by last month's Supreme Court Tsilhqot'in ruling – is also seeking a declaration of aboriginal title over areas where Enbridge tankers have been deemed to pose the greatest threat to the Gitga'at people.

The Gitga'at raised title-related concerns to the Joint Review Panel but those concerns were not addressed, said Michael Lee Ross, a lawyer representing the Gitga'at.

"They've got the evidence, they have made a good case for title to the areas they are talking about and they are asking the Federal Court of Appeal … to declare the federal government unjustifiably infringed their title in approving this project," Mr. Ross said.

The most recent legal actions were "not unexpected" and Enbridge remains confident in the joint-review-panel process, Enbridge spokesman Ivan Giesbrecht said.

"After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence and hearing hundreds of hours of expert testimony, the Panel concluded that Northern Gateway can be built and operated safely and that it is in the national interest of our country," Mr. Giesbrecht said in an e-mailed statement.

Enbridge is currently focusing on 113 preconstruction conditions placed on the project and anticipates that process will take between 12 and 18 months, Mr. Giesbrecht added.

Story continues below advertisement

Ottawa announced its approval for the project – subject to 209 conditions – on June 17. Backed by Calgary-based Enbridge, the twin-pipeline Northern Gateway project would carry oil from Alberta to Kitimat, B.C., where it would be loaded on to tankers for shipment to export markets.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies