Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The B.C. government is expected to announce this week if it will build a third hydroelectric dam – Site C – on the Peace River, completing a project that has been stalled at the drafting stage since the 1970s. It may stand as the biggest legacy of Christy Clark's government. It also comes with a price tag that will make it the single largest financial decision the Premier is likely to make.

If her cabinet signs off on the construction, it is effectively signing a cheque for $8.5-billion – or more – while forever changing the landscape of the Peace River valley, and almost guaranteeing a protracted legal battle with First Nations and others in the region.

Here are five key matters that the cabinet will consider:

Story continues below advertisement

Does B.C. need the additional power, and are there alternatives?

In its forecasts, BC Hydro says rising demand for electricity means the province will need new energy resources by the year 2022, and it will take eight years to build Site C.

However, last May, a joint environmental review panel said it could not determine if Site C is the most cost-effective source of new power. And the panel found the province's electricity supply won't be maxed out until the year 2028. It urged the Crown corporation to look at unconventional energy sources such as geothermal power, and more conservation options.

What will it cost, and what would that mean for B.C.'s debt?

BC Hydro maintains the project can be built for $7.9-billion, but last week the Premier suggested that is a low-ball figure. She pegged Site C at $8.5-billion. Her energy minister then warned even that estimate is probably low. This is not the kind of sticker surprise that the bond-rating agencies like to hear, and it just happens that Finance Minister Mike de Jong is on his way to New York later this week to meet with the agencies that set the government's credit rating. A credit downgrade would mean higher borrowing costs for the province – something the B.C. Liberal government has worked hard to avoid.

What will be the impact on First Nations and the environment?

The panel found that construction of Site C would result in significant adverse effects for First Nations – fishing, hunting and trapping lost, sacred native sites that date back thousands of years flooded. As well, replacing a portion of the Peace River with an 83-kilometre reservoir would cause significant adverse effects on fish, birds, bats, rare plants and sensitive ecosystems. Roland Willson, chief of the West Moberly First Nations, says the province needs to look at the cumulative environmental impact of all the development in the region, already disrupted by dams, coal mines, pipelines and natural-gas drilling. "The importance of the last chunk of free-flowing river is immense. You can't put a dollar figure on it," he said in an interview. "I don't think they have taken into account we are going to start pushing back on other development if this goes ahead."

Story continues below advertisement

Do electricity and liquefied natural gas mix?

In an interview last week with the Bloomberg news agency in New York, Ms. Clark said she is prepared to abandon Site C if it runs up against her ambitions to land investment in liquefied natural gas. Why the conflict? LNG proponents are concerned that B.C. won't have enough skilled labour to build their projects. At least six of the top jobs overlap, including heavy equipment operators, iron workers and carpenters. Jobs Minister Shirley Bond said it should not be a problem – she expects peak construction activity for Site C will wrap conveniently around that of the five LNG plants the province hopes to see built. That assumes everything goes according to schedule. Which brings us to one other key question:

Never mind the budget, can Site C be built on time?

As of last Friday, there are six applications for judicial review seeking to overturn the environment certificates that have been granted for the project. The first case is expected to be heard in April, but BC Hydro wants to start site preparation in January. Rob Botterell, lawyer for the Peace Valley Landowner Association, said it would be foolish to start building before the legal doubts are settled. "B.C. taxpayers and hydro ratepayers could be saddled with the bill for hundreds of millions of dollars of work that the court ultimately finds was not authorized."

A green light from the B.C. cabinet this week, if it comes, won't be the last hurdle for this megaproject.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies