Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Former A-G Plant to lead B.C. legal team in Northern Gateway hearings

B.C. Premier Christy Clark, left, introduces Geoff Plant as lead legal counsel in the ongoing Northern Gateway hearings while Environment Minister Terry Lake attends.

Ian Bailey/The Globe and Mail

The B.C. government made its debut at the Northern Gateway pipeline hearings on Thursday with a new high-profile lawyer appointed to represent British Columbians' interests, a signal that the province will no longer steer clear of the process.

But the first day of questioning was derailed after less than 15 minutes, when review panel chair Sheila Leggett adjourned the hearing until Friday to give the B.C. legal team more time to review a recently filed document the lawyers appear not to have read.

The legal team left Vancouver Thursday morning with fanfare, with Premier Christy Clark announcing the appointment of former attorney general Geoff Plant to stickhandle the file. Mr. Plant joined the legal team and Environment Minister Terry Lake at the hearings in Edmonton.

Story continues below advertisement

Enbridge Inc.'s controversial Northern Gateway pipeline proposal has been a tough political topic for the Clark government. The Premier announced in July that her government will not endorse the $6-billion project unless a series of demands are met, including a "fair share of the fiscal and economic benefits."

Still, the government has been under fire for failing to take a more aggressive role in the hearings – it gave up the option of a joint hearing, and did not provide evidence before the hearing deadline. Mr. Plant, who served in a previous B.C. Liberal government, was named in a bid to signal that the current government is taking the hearings seriously.

The Premier said the appointment ensures that B.C. "has absolutely the best legal advice. We're bringing the 'A' team to make sure we are doing everything we can to get the answers that British Columbians need."

Mr. Plant told reporters his first task is to examine the company's structure to ensure that Enbridge can't avoid responsibility if an environmental disaster occurs.

"Enbridge is a huge and complex and very successful company. I'm not worried that they're creating a shell, but I don't want them to create a shell," he said. "The people of British Columbia don't want to face the prospect of someone building a pipeline that isn't in the position where they can be held directly accountable for some harm caused."

At the hearings, however, the B.C. legal team was challenged on its line of questioning.

Elisabeth Graff, a lawyer with the B.C. government, began asking the president of Northern Gateway about the insurance policies Enbridge carries against spills and other incidents. But Ms. Leggett intervened, pointing out that discussion of compensation available in case of an accident would be held at meetings scheduled for Prince George in October.

Story continues below advertisement

Enbridge responded that its executives were prepared to discuss the topic – but wondered if perhaps Ms. Graff had failed to read a recent submission to the review panel on exactly that topic.

"Just by the questioning, Ms. Graff may not have seen the response … yet that was filed Sept. 4," said Bernard Roth, a lawyer for Enbridge.

To provide time for the B.C. team to get up to speed, Ms. Leggett adjourned the hearing until Friday morning.

Mr. Plant, speaking to reporters after the adjournment, maintained that B.C. was not unprepared, but the order of the topics was simply being debated. "I can assure you it's not a question of preparation," he said. "All the questions that are relevant will be asked."

Mr. Lake said later in an interview that the B.C. team had been told in advance that its line of questioning was appropriate for the hearing Thursday. "I'm a bit frustrated," he said. "It is unfortunate if we were given the wrong information from Enbridge"

Rob Fleming, the B.C. New Democratic Party environment critic, said the province has come too late to the process to make a difference in the outcome, and called the adjournment an embarrassment for B.C. "The day was a disaster for the 'A' team."

Story continues below advertisement

In a contract that expired in June, Mr. Plant was registered as a consultant lobbyist for the Gitxsan Treaty Society, which had tentatively negotiated a deal with Enbridge on the pipeline before backing away amid a storm of opposition. Gordon Sebastian, a negotiator with the Gitxsan Treaty Society, applauded Mr. Plant's appointment to represent B.C., saying he is optimistic the province will now have a better understanding of first nations' interests in the pipeline project.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Authors
B.C. politics reporter

Based in the press gallery of the B.C. Legislature in Victoria, Justine has followed the ups and downs of B.C. premiers since 1988. She has also worked as a business reporter and on Parliament Hill covering national politics. More

Parliamentary reporter

Josh is a parliamentary reporter in Ottawa. Before moving to the nation's capital in 2013, he covered provincial affairs in Edmonton and throughout Alberta. He joined the Globe in 2008 in Toronto before returning to his home province in 2010. More

B.C. reporter

Ian Bailey is a Vancouver-based reporter for The Globe and Mail.  He covers politics and general news. Prior to arriving at The Globe and Mail, he reported from Toronto and St. John’s for The Canadian Press.  He has also covered British Columbia for CP, The National Post and The Province. More

Asia Bureau Chief

Nathan VanderKlippe is the Asia correspondent for The Globe and Mail. He was previously a print and television correspondent in Western Canada based in Calgary, Vancouver and Yellowknife, where he covered the energy industry, aboriginal issues and Canada’s north.He is the recipient of a National Magazine Award and a Best in Business award from the Society of American Business Editors and Writers. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨