Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Keith Wiens stared at the floor as a judge handed a life sentence to the former policeman, for shooting and killing his unarmed spouse and attempting to cover it up by placing a knife in her hand.

Justice Geoff Barrow declared Mr. Wiens should not be eligible for parole for 13 years for the murder of Lynn Kalmring in their home in August 2011.

"I'm satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Wiens put the knife in her hand after the fact in order to deflect his responsibility for his conduct," Justice Barrow said. "I do not believe his evidence and neither did the jury."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Wiens, 56, shuffled off with the sheriff for the last time after the B.C. Supreme Court jury convicted him of second-degree murder. Dressed in red prison clothes, he never looked back at his brother, sister-in-law and another supporter in the gallery.

Ms. Kalmring's family is happy the judge rejected Mr. Wiens's defence that he shot her to protect himself when she stormed into their bedroom with a knife aimed at his throat.

"He's got life in prison. That's where he needs to be," said Ms. Kalmring's sister Donna Irwin. "He can't get parole for at least 13 years, and then in those 13 years, we will be there at that parole hearing to make sure he never sees the light of day."

The judge accepted the evidence of Shelley Peretelson, who spoke to her sister, Ms. Kalmring, by phone shortly before she was killed. Ms. Kalmring, 55, was upset but not angry that Mr. Wiens believed her working full time was more important than their relationship, Ms. Peretelson said.

Ms. Kalmring told her sister she'd thrown $2,000 of her savings and her ring at Mr. Wiens. She placed the cash in an orderly pile on the kitchen island after the argument, which contradicted Mr. Wiens's description of her being in a state of frenzied anger, the judge said.

Three of Ms. Kalmring's former spouses testified Ms. Kalmring was not violent in arguments, Barrow said. Attacking Mr. Wiens with a knife was uncharacteristic because she hated weapons. And Mr. Wiens was taller, 50 pounds heavier and a skilled RCMP veteran who could defend himself.

"It's highly unlikely she'd attack him with or without a knife," Justice Barrow said.

Story continues below advertisement

The body's position on the floor also belied Mr. Wiens's version of what happened. A pool of Ms. Kalmring's blood on the bed suggested she was standing by the bed when he shot her. Yet she ended up on her back and closer to the door with her legs outstretched and her left arm extended perpendicular to her body.

"I accept she died instantly and collapsed in the location she was standing," the judge said.

Mr. Wiens denied that finances were a source of friction between them. Yet he wrote an angry letter to Ms. Kalmring eight months earlier complaining she wasn't paying household expenses.

His denial tainted his evidence entirely, Justice Barrow said.

"It was an issue in their relationship and it was an issue on Aug. 15."

Mr. Wiens had no previous record and a 26-year career as a Mountie, much of it in Summerland. He submitted no character references and his adult son never attended the trial.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's a good day. We're all going to sleep well tonight, go back to our homes . . . and get on with our lives because that's what Lynn would want," Ms. Irwin said.

"We're never going to get over it. We're just getting through it. So now we can actually start the grieving process because we've never had that opportunity."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies