Skip to main content

The area of the Peace River where the proposed Site C hydro development dam would be built near Fort St. John, B.C., on Jan. 17, 2013.

Deborah Baic/The Globe and Mail

The release of a report on the proposed Site C power project in Northern B.C. will send the federal and provincial governments into six months of reflection on whether to approve the $7.9-billion dam that was proposed decades ago.

The B.C. government said Thursday it has six months to make a decision and will first consult the First Nations community that stands to be harshly affected as the project floods territories used for hunting and fishing.

Premier Christy Clark has previously expressed support for the proposal to build an earthen dam and 1,100-megawatt hydroelectric generating station on the Peace River in Northern B.C.

Story continues below advertisement

However, Energy Minister Bill Bennett told reporters in Victoria that government will gather information to make a decision. Mr. Bennett has said his ministry will take until late October to decide whether to proceed, and then that recommendation will go before cabinet.

Site C would be the third in a series of dams built on the Peace River since 1967. A second dam was completed 23 kilometres from the first dam in 1980.

While Mr. Bennett met the media, federal Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq kept a lower profile.

"The minister will carefully review and consider the panel's findings. It would not be appropriate to comment further at this point.," spokesperson Ted Laking said in an e-mail.

Lucille Jamault, manager of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, said in an e-mail that the project cannot proceed without the authorization of both levels of government as well as all necessary permits.

Both governments are likely to be lobbied by the First Nations community, environmentalists and others opposed to the project – many of whom seized on contradictory statements in the report.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter