Skip to main content

Conceptual drawing of the Granville Street Bridge with pedestrian centre

Handout

The Granville Bridge is a truck route that carries 65,000 vehicles a day. It's one of the city's unloveliest water crossings.

But to city planners, it could become the unlikely home to a pastoral, Brooklyn-Bridge-style greenway down the middle for pedestrians and cyclists.

That's one idea floated as part of the city's sweeping new transportation plan aimed at increasing non-car trips in Vancouver to 60 per cent of all travel in the next 20 years from the current 40 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

The idea is not actually written in the plan, but made its debut to the public this week as one of several conceptual drawings showing the kind of changes Vancouver might make – including a pedestrian-only Robson Square – to make the city more friendly for walking and cycling.

"The Granville Bridge idea was a way of showing the possibilities," city transportation engineer Jerry Dobrovolny said. "Everything we've shown is feasible. That bridge has eight lanes and it's far overcapacity."

But the idea came as a surprise to many, even groups that have been consulted at length about the city's plan in the past few months, and is prompting bewildered responses about how it would actually work.

The Burrard Bridge was redone in 2009 to create a bike lane on each side, and the idea of taking down the two viaduct bridges that connect downtown to the east side of the city has been discussed since 2010.

For some, even though they welcome changes that enhance Vancouver's unique downtown culture, it's all overwhelming.

"We're being inundated with a number of transformative changes," said Charles Gauthier, executive director of the Downtown Vancouver Business Improvement Association.

On the other side of the bridge, his counterpart at the South Granville Business Improvement Association was somewhat warmer to the concept, but still confused.

Story continues below advertisement

"If it can revitalize that whole section of Granville [north of Broadway], that'd be cool," said Sharon Townsend. "There's art galleries, there's all this cultural activity there." At the moment, drivers tend to zoom past it at high speed.

However, Ms. Townsend said she couldn't figure out how engineers would get people from the middle of a busy six-lane bridge over to the sidewalks on either side at each end.

Predictably, cycling advocates said they were in favour of anything that would make the Granville Bridge less terrifying.

"It's really dangerous, and it's really unpleasant," former Non-Partisan Association councillor Peter Ladner said. "I've scurried over that bridge in fear many times."

In spite of the proliferation of ideas promoting walking, cycling and transit in the city's 187 recommendations for its Transportation 2040 plan, Mr. Dobrovolny said the plan also makes it clear which routes are primarily meant for cars and trucks.

Rather than turn every street into a "complete street," with space for cyclists and cars on each one, the city's plan makes it clear that some routes – like the two streets that feed into the Granville Bridge, Seymour and Howe – will give priority to motor vehicles.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.