Skip to main content

The decision orders B.C. to pay $6-million to fix a transportation system that gets some students to francophone schools, and do more to facilitate the transfer of school sites from English-language boards to the francophone board.

Getty Images/iStockphoto

A judge has ruled that the B.C. government has violated the rights of francophone students in several communities across the province, including the west side of Vancouver, where parents have complained schools in the French system are small and overcrowded.

The B.C. Supreme Court decision released on Monday orders the province to pay $6-million to fix a transportation system that some students use to get to francophone schools, and do more to facilitate the transfer of school sites from English-language boards to the francophone board.

The ruling comes a year after the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a B.C. judgment that the Charter rights of students at Vancouver's École Rose-des-vents, on the city's west side, had been breached because their facilities and instruction were not equivalent to those at majority-language schools.

Story continues below advertisement

In the current case, a group of parents and the francophone school board – Conseil-scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique (CSF) – said the province violated Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees minority-language education to francophones in areas where numbers warrant it.

"It is a very significant win for the plaintiffs because the court recognized there are systemic problems in the way the Ministry of Education has analyzed funding requests by [CSF]," Mark Power, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said on Monday.

The plaintiffs sought new or improved schools in 17 communities and a new office for the school board. The trial ran from late 2013 to February of this year.

In a 1,600-page written decision, Justice Loryl Russell concluded transportation for the francophone system had been "chronically underfunded" during a decade-long spending freeze. The judge also said province had failed to help transfer school sites from English-language school boards to the francophone board.

The judge's conclusions varied by community: for Whistler (for elementary education), Nelson, Richmond, Southeast Vancouver, Nanaimo, Kelowna and Chilliwack, for example, she deemed services appropriate.

In Pemberton and Victoria, she found facilities were substandard, but that the breach of Charter rights was justified. In still other communities, she found minority language schools were substandard, but that the defendants were not responsible.

But in four communities – Sechelt, Penticton, Abbotsford and Vancouver's west side – the judge concluded adequate facilities were lacking and that the defendants – the provincial government and the Minister of Education – were to blame.

Story continues below advertisement

In Abbotsford, the province's failure to finance new projects between 2005 and 2011 contributed to the charter breach, the judge wrote.

Schools2

Judge Russell re Conseil-scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique v. British Columbia (Education) 09...

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter