Canada's spy agency should hand over information that could shed light on whether a British Columbia man found guilty of terrorism was the victim of police manipulation, a court has heard.
Lawyer Marilyn Sandford said she wants the B.C. Supreme Court to order disclosure of all correspondence between the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Mounties related to the investigation of her client John Nuttall and his wife Amanda Korody.
Mr. Nuttall and Ms. Korody were found guilty three weeks ago of planning to set off pressure-cooker bombs on the grounds of the B.C. Legislature in 2013.
Their lawyers are scheduled to begin arguments next week that the couple were entrapped and that police manipulated them into carrying out their Canada Day bomb plot.
Ms. Sandford told the court on Tuesday that it appeared as though CSIS had information on Mr. Nuttall's and Ms. Korody's case beyond what the RCMP has so far released.
She pointed to the possible involvement of another individual in the case who may have acted as a source for a CSIS investigation, which Ms. Sandford argued would be "of extreme relevance to the issue of entrapment."
"We require disclosure concerning [the individual] in order to investigate his potential role, if he was a human source, as an agent provocateur who encouraged Mr. Nuttall to commit violent acts," Ms. Sandford told the court.
She referenced wire intercepts disclosed in the earlier trial, which, she said, strongly indicate "that that's what he was doing in the name of Islamic jihadist extremism."
The court heard that documents disclosed by the Mounties consist of little more than a single line from CSIS advising police that Mr. Nuttall may be a national security threat.
"We have the RCMP saying, 'there's nothing here,'" said Ms. Sandford. "Well, there seems to be a lot more here than what meets the eye."
Crown lawyer Peter Eccles opposed the application, insisting that CSIS has no obligation to share information with anyone and that any information would be irrelevant to the defence's case.
The RCMP can ask for information and the spy agency is fully entitled to tell the Mounties "to pound sand," Mr. Eccles told the court.
He also pointed out that the question of entrapment relates to the conduct of the RCMP and not CSIS.
"They had no idea about the CSIS information," Mr. Eccles said. "So how can the presence or absence of CSIS material have an impact on the RCMP's [conduct]?"
He accused the defence of embarking on a fishing expedition, calling its "broad, sweeping request" for information from CSIS as "a pure shot in the dark."
Besides its correspondence with the RCMP, defence is asking for disclosure from CSIS for all surveillance information related to Mr. Nuttall and Ms. Korody collected between Jan. 1, 2011 and July 1, 2013, when the pair was arrested.
A trial, set to begin next week, will examine if Mr. Nuttall and Ms. Korody were entrapped by police into attempting their bomb plot.