Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content



Light rail showdown: Vancouver versus Seattle Add to ...

As the new light-rail lines that run from downtown to the airport in Seattle and Vancouver mark their one-year anniversaries this summer, the differences between the two are as striking as the similarities.

Both were built after years of public wrangling, cost staggering amounts of money, and had to grapple with challenging construction. But one has four times as many riders as the other.

Both are seen as triumphs for rapid transit. But for one city, the new line is just a first step in a journey to creating a modern-day rapid-transit system. For the other, it's an addition that pulls the whole system together.

As a result, both the Canada Line in Vancouver and the Central Link in Seattle are case studies, examined intently by planners, transit experts and regular citizens anxious about the future of urban life.

Cities from Shanghai to Paris are scrambling to create rapid-transit networks or expand what they have, as the health of metropolitan economies becomes dependent on efficient ways to move large numbers of people around. Even Los Angeles, long viewed as the city of freeways, now has 130 kilometres of rail lines and ambitious plans to build much more.

So as the sister cities on the West Coast celebrate the first birthday of their shiny new lines, it is also a celebration of a year-long experiment, revealing exactly what has worked, and where they missed the mark. For many transportation experts, Vancouver has emerged the winner.

"Both lines are really important. Both are part of what are going to be incredibly successful systems. But Vancouver is out in front," says Jarrett Walker, an Australia-based international consultant in public-transit network design.

"It's because their system is driverless. The reason I talk about Vancouver all over the world is that it's a system you turn on in the morning and it can go all day without costing any more."




Community Support

Taxpayers never got to vote on the line, though they pay for it through fares and property taxes. Instead, council representatives from 22 municipalities had to approve it, with the provincial government pushing to have it completed for the 2010 Olympics. It took three contentious votes before it was passed in 2003.

Voters in three counties agreed to pay new fees and taxes in order to support a rail line in 1996. But it took another decade for Sound Transit, the regional authority, to get the line started, partly because construction costs soared far past the original amount taxpayers had approved. That sparked arguments among public officials on whether and how to scale the line back.

Business Support

Construction of the Canada Line set off major protests from businesses in the Cambie Village section of the line, after it was announced that a cut-and-cover construction method would be used instead of boring a tunnel. The province eventually created a $2-million fund available to help the Cambie business association. But 38 businesses out of 275 shut down or left Cambie. Susan Heyes sued for losses to her business during the two years of construction and won $600,000 in B.C. Supreme Court last year, but that decision is being appealed. The Cambie Village Business Association has started a class-action lawsuit on behalf of the others.

Sound Transit created a $50-million pool to help businesses affected by the construction. Business owners who could prove they made less money during the five years of construction could get grants from a $15-million fund, and another $26-million was available for loans to promote economic development. As a result, 80 per cent of the businesses that existed before the line's construction were still there five years later.





The total cost to build the Canada Line was $2.1-billion, with the federal government contributing $400-million, the province $400-million, and the Vancouver airport $300-million. TransLink, the region's transit authority, put up $375-million. As well, it has to pay back the private consortium that provided the remainder of the money, which it's doing at a rate of $6.5-million every 28 days. Canada Line is operated by a private company, so there are no public figures on operating expenses or fares. But fares for TransLink's entire bus-ferry-rail-train system cover 53 per cent of the total costs, and TransLink says fares generated by the other two SkyTrain lines, one of which intersects the Canada Line, cover the operating costs of those lines 100 per cent.

It cost $2.6-billion to build the line, with the federal government contributing $500-million. Operating and maintenance costs for 2010 are pegged at $45.5-million. Sound Transit recovers 53 per cent of its operating cost through fares.


The line captured riders from established suburban bus lines coming from the south, and travels along a route that has a thriving suburban downtown, a casino, a college, a major shopping centre, a hospital and central downtown. As a result, it's been enormously popular since the day it opened, handled a peak of 287,000 passengers during the Olympics and now services over 100,000 riders on weekdays.

Report Typo/Error
Single page

Follow on Twitter: @fabulavancouver


Next story




Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular

Advertise with us

Your number one partner for reaching Canada's Influential Achievers.

The Globe at your Workplace

Globe Corporate Sales

Globe Unlimited digital edition and Globe2Go e-paper group discounts available. Learn more

Corporate financial data and content licensing for your organization. Learn more

Our Company
Secure Services
Customer Service
Mobile Apps
Other Sections