Skip to main content

David Keane, president of the B.C. LNG Alliance, prepares to address the Vancouver Board of Trade on Wednesday.

DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The B.C. government must hammer out a tax and regulatory regime this month to give the province's fledgling liquefied natural gas sector a fighting chance to compete against global energy powerhouses, says the head of a new industry association.

David Keane, president of the B.C. LNG Alliance, said the government can't afford to squeeze industry players because high taxes will scare off energy investment on the West Coast.

"A company sizing up a final investment decision does so in the context of what is happening in British Columbia, but also what is happening globally," Mr. Keane said in his keynote speech Wednesday to the Vancouver Board of Trade's energy forum. "When you prepare to invest billions of dollars on an LNG project, you do so based on sound due diligence, foresight and strong understanding of the economics."

Story continues below advertisement

Premier Christy Clark's Liberal government is preparing to unveil details of LNG tax and regulatory rules within two weeks. While Ms. Clark and B.C. Natural Gas Development Minister Rich Coleman have painted a rosy picture for LNG in the province, Mr. Keane cautioned that prosperity is far from guaranteed.

"A new LNG industry in British Columbia is not a foregone conclusion," he warned, noting that B.C. lags in the global LNG race against rivals such as Australia, Qatar, Nigeria and the United States. "The B.C. LNG Alliance is concerned about our global competitiveness and the overall fiscal framework in British Columbia and Canada."

Two more proponents, Woodfibre LNG and Triton LNG, joined the alliance this week to boost its membership to six. The alliance's other four members are Pacific NorthWest LNG, LNG Canada, Kitimat LNG and Prince Rupert LNG.

Mr. Coleman said earlier this week that he is confident the final tax framework will strike a proper balance between reaching a good deal for B.C. taxpayers and spurring companies to forge ahead with massive LNG projects. "It is a complicated package that's got to mesh together. It's an extreme amount of work to do," he said in an interview.

Pacific NorthWest LNG, led by Malaysia's state-owned Petronas, is considered a bellwether for the fortunes of the province's nascent LNG industry. Executives at Petronas and Pacific NorthWest LNG have been warning in recent weeks about how B.C. will miss a lucrative window of opportunity unless tax and environmental issues are quickly resolved.

In an interview after his Wednesday speech, Mr. Keane said he recognizes the importance of co-operating with environmental regulators.

"All of our members are working very hard to make sure that they get the environmental part of their projects right," he said. "They're working closely with First Nations, with local communities and with environmental regulators in the province and the federal government to ensure that they operate at a very high standard."

Story continues below advertisement

Pacific NorthWest LNG filed its environmental impact statement in February for its export terminal planned for Lelu Island in northwestern British Columbia. This week, project officials disclosed that they revised designs so that a 1.6-kilometre-long suspension bridge would be built to avoid disturbing environmentally sensitive habitat for fish and marine mammals.

Last month, Pacific NorthWest LNG requested and received an extra 45 days to submit additional information to regulators. The environmental review is slated to be completed by Nov. 5. Legal experts calculate that after two B.C. cabinet ministers receive the assessment report, they will have another 45 days to render a joint verdict on whether to issue an environmental assessment certificate to Pacific NorthWest LNG, extending the timeline to Dec. 20.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter