Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Long-time advocate for drug-policy reform wins prize recognizing work in face of opposition

Donald MacPherson championed once-radical initiatives such as supervised consumption sites, prescription heroin and drug decriminalization.

Yelin Gemma Lee/via The Canadian Press

Today, he is one of Canada's leading advocates for drug-policy reform, having championed once-radical initiatives such as supervised consumption sites, prescription heroin and drug decriminalization as more thoughtful alternatives to the war on drugs.

But when Donald MacPherson first arrived in Vancouver from Toronto in 1986, he knew nothing about the issue. Working as director of the Carnegie Community Centre in the city's Downtown Eastside, he recalled witnessing over a few years what was once largely an alcohol and pill culture shift toward a "full-blown drug scene" with heroin, cocaine and crack cocaine.

"I was on the corner, running this centre, and just watching this take place," recalled Mr. MacPherson, now the executive director of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition. "I became totally puzzled by why no one was doing anything to respond to this."

Story continues below advertisement

In 2000, he became the city's first drug-policy co-ordinator, developing the four-pillars drug strategy and advocating for evidence-based, albeit often controversial, approaches to problematic substance use. Among 36 recommendations were two – supervised drug-use sites and heroin-assisted treatment – that quietly signalled that the city would start to do things differently.

Mr. MacPherson this week received Simon Fraser University's 2017 Nora and Ted Sterling Prize in Support of Controversy – an award to recognize those who look beyond conventional wisdom to advance human progress in the face of opposition.

He used his lecture to discuss some of the successes that came out of Vancouver's drug epidemic of the 1990s – such as the opening of Insite, Canada's first public supervised-injection site – but also the lull in progress since.

"Somehow, we lost our momentum," Mr. MacPherson told the full house at SFU's Harbour Centre. "Politics changed. The urgency changed. The overdose rate came down to a 'tolerable' 200 or 250 [from a then-high of 400]."

Sixteen years after the launch of the four-pillars approach, British Columbia has more than two dozen government-sanctioned sites where drug users can consume under supervision; a small-scale prescription-heroin program; and a circle of top health officials calling for the decriminalization of petty drug use and possession. (The four-pillars approach is based on harm reduction, prevention, treatment and enforcement.)

And on Wednesday, the province officially adopted guidelines for supervised injectable opioid-assisted treatment, which signals a new and critical approach to reaching drug users who don't respond to traditional therapies such as methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone.

But Mr. MacPherson doesn't see these developments as signs of good progress.

Story continues below advertisement

"I think we failed to scale up the four-pillars approach," he said. "We started down a road that looked comprehensive … but we didn't go past Insite. Thirteen years later, we have more injection sites; what happened in that 13 years? Insite was at capacity in a few weeks.

"We did some good things: methadone prescribing increase, the outreach to people around HIV medications," he continued. "But we did not really scale up as Europeans did, to meet the scale of the problem. We got started down a road and then got stalled."

The relative inaction until recent years compounded the current overdose crisis because the province was not prepared for the arrival of illicit fentanyl, Mr. MacPherson added: "Fentanyl is a game-changer – therefore, we need to change the game."

Mr. MacPherson donated his $5,000 award to several drug-policy advocacy groups, including the Canadian Association of Drug Users, which is raising funds to send a delegation to Portugal to study the effect the country's decriminalization of drugs has had.

In attendance at the SFU event was long-time drug user and drug-policy activist Dean Wilson, who shared an anecdote about showing up at Mr. MacPherson's door in the Christmas of 2004, when he had dropped to 110 pounds and had "few options and even less hope."

"Your continued support has allowed me to come through to the other side, where I've had the same house for seven years, the same phone number for 10," Mr. Wilson said. "Donald, it's an honour for me to call you friend."

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.