Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Non-profit service agencies under greater scrutiny in wake of PHS scandal

Mark Townsend, middle, former executive director of the Portland Hotel Society, catches up with some of the first people he worked in the Downtown Eastside over 20 years ago at Woodward's Housing run by PHS Community Services Society in Vancouver, March 23, 2014. In the wake of revelations of questionable spending at PHS, other non-profit service providers are under more scrutiny.

Rafal Gerszak/The Globe and Mail

Non-profit housing and service agencies are feeling a cold wind of suspicion pass over them in the aftermath of revelations about unchecked spending by PHS Community Services.

Some say they're getting questions from donors and the public, asking how they can be sure that non-profits are reliable. Others haven't heard those questions yet, but expect to.

"It is going throughout the community," said Joanne Hausch, the chairwoman of the board for Family Services of Greater Vancouver, as well as a partner at the accounting firm Deloitte. "Some members have been asked whether our agency is involved at all [in the PHS situation] and the question is, 'Are you different?'"

Story continues below advertisement

Four PHS managers, including founders Mark Townsend and Liz Evans, resigned from their organization three weeks ago under pressure from the province after an audit showed that their finances were chaotic. There were all kinds of expenses that didn't appear to fit the mandate of a group working in the Downtown Eastside.

Although a lot of spending on flowers, spa gifts and restaurants was for staff or residents, the audits also provided details of trips that managers made to Europe, New York, Disneyland and Hawaii, staying in expensive hotels and travelling by limousine.

The public, besides being shocked at some of the spending, has asked how provincial funders didn't know about any of it until recently.

There's been one bombshell after another reverberating throughout the non-profit community as more details from the audit have been publicized and other organizations' finances are scrutinized by the media.

"We're cautiously concerned about being tarred with the same brush," said Jim Frankish, a University of B.C. professor specializing in homelessness who is on the board of 40-year-old Lookout Emergency Aid Society.

Ms. Hausch, Mr. Frankish and others are dealing with it by offering advice on how to assess the board and operations of a non-profit.

"You can take a look at a group's board, its website, its audited financial statements. It's important that there's a strong board that meets regularly," Ms. Hausch said.

Story continues below advertisement

At The Bloom Group Community Services Society, (former St. James Community Services Society), executive director Jonathan Oldman is talking to anyone with concerns about the controls in place for their own group's finances.

"This is of concern for all of us," said Mr. Oldman, whose organization serves about 1,500 people in the Lower Mainland with housing, money-management services and emergency shelters. "We're a 50-year-old non-profit that is dependent on our reputation and our credibility."

And at least one is considering posting all of its audits and financial statements online from now on.

"I think we're just going to have to make everything more transparent," said Janice Abbott, the CEO of Atira Housing Women's Resource Society.

The most recent audit on her own organization made the headlines for a day recently, because it showed that Atira had to get an almost $1-million bailout from BC Housing to cover repair bills. The auditor also noted that Atira appeared to be financially stressed and raised questions about its long-term viability.

Family Services already posts information on its website about who is on the board and its financial statements. The Bloom Group has a tradition of publishing its annual report on its website with a note saying that anyone who wants to see the financial statements can come to the office and see them.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Frankish said that he knows it will be a topic of discussion at the next Lookout board meeting – whether their organization should make even more information publicly available.

The PHS website had never provided any of that or, in fact, any information at all – even the organization's address. The one category that had a lot of material was the photo gallery.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Urban affairs contributor

Frances Bula has written about urban issues and city politics in B.C.’s Vancouver region, covering everything from Downtown Eastside drug addiction to billion-dollar development projects, since 1994. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨