Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

In recent years, relations between Ottawa and the provinces have been relatively peaceful – give or take the odd explosion from the now-retired Danny Williams.

But there may be acrimony on the horizon, battles that not only could pit the federal government against provinces but provinces against some of their provincial counterparts. And perhaps not surprisingly, money is at the root of it.

The federal Conservatives served notice in the recent budget that they intend to take a more activist role in energy policy. They introduced changes to streamline the environmental review process that will allow decisions to be reached much more quickly. And cabinet now has the power to overrule the National Energy Board on major projects that are considered to be in the national interest.

Story continues below advertisement

The new rules are not retroactive, which means they will not impact the current NEB hearings into the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline. Both Ottawa and Alberta desperately hope the pipeline is approved, because of the billions in oil royalties it represents. The B.C. NDP, meantime, is vehemently opposed to the project. The New Democrats currently hold a huge lead in public opinion polls and could well form the government here in a year's time.

If they do, and the pipeline proposal gets a stamp of approval from the NEB, get ready for a truly ugly clash that will see Ottawa and Alberta on one side and B.C. on the other. And that may be just the beginning of the animosity.

Kinder Morgan has announced plans to expand its Trans Mountain pipeline that runs from Alberta to the Port of Vancouver.

The $5-billion proposal would triple capacity and dramatically increase oil tanker traffic in Vancouver harbour. Resistance to the plan in B.C. is already mounting. The B.C. NDP is refusing to take an official position until it sees final plans from Kinder Morgan, but it's hard to imagine the party giving its approval to a proposal that is so vociferously opposed by its core supporters.

That project, when and if it gets to the review stage, will fall under the new federal guidelines. That means that regardless of what the NEB decides, the federal cabinet could unilaterally rule that the project is going ahead in the "national interest."

Given the vast sums of money Ottawa and Alberta are likely to reap from the project, it's not difficult to imagine such a decision being taken regardless of whatever public and political opposition may exist to it inside British Columbia.

B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake also concedes this could happen. But he thinks history has proven that defying a province's wishes is not always an easy thing to do. On that point, he recalls the ultimately successful crusade Newfoundland premier Danny Williams waged with Ottawa over access to resource riches off the Atlantic coast.

Story continues below advertisement

It was a winning battle that made Mr. Williams one of the most popular politicians in Newfoundland history. Wars with Ottawa aren't always a bad thing. Wars between provinces are more unusual. And on that front, the congenial relationship that B.C. enjoys with Alberta could be severely strained in the coming years.

Mr. Lake's government continues to send out strong signals that Alberta is going to have to write a big cheque in order to mitigate the environmental risks B.C. would be assuming with any of these pipeline proposals.

Mr. Lake says the public discourse around the Enbridge proposal is growing inside the province. British Columbians, he says, can see how Alberta and the federal government are going to benefit from the project but can't see what's in it for British Columbians beyond a few construction jobs. "In terms of taxes and royalties and things like that, from what we know the benefits to British Columbians certainly aren't as great as they are to Alberta," says Mr. Lake.

Mr. Lake says the oil sands are an accident of geography. So, he says, is the B.C. coast, which Alberta wants to use to ship its crude. "We both have assets that are needed," he says, "so there should be an equitable or a fair discussion about benefits in any of these types of projects."

Oil politics in Canada are just heating up. The rancour and discord they will ignite could alter federal-provincial dynamics for years to come.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies