Skip to main content

A group of protesters gathers outside the Northern Gateway hearings in Prince Rupert, B.C., on Dec. 10, 2012.

Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press

One of the key concerns for the federal government in a multimillion-dollar Natural Resources advertising campaign was the negative publicity around the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, according to internal government documents.

In particular, the statement of work provided to the ad company a year ago noted that media coverage had been critical of legislative changes that gave the federal cabinet power to override the National Energy Board recommendations on project approval.

There was also criticism of changes that limited public participation in joint review panel hearings that are currently taking place in B.C., said the April 2012 document obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

Story continues below advertisement

Among the key issues:

- "allegations that these changes will put British Columbia's sovereignty at stake;"

- "if cabinet can override the National Energy Board, why bother with Northern Gateway hearings, for a project which the government has already declared to be in the national interest;"

- "ongoing uncertainty over impact of the Responsible Resource Development changes to the Northern Gateway pipeline;"

- "putting Responsible Resource Development changes in the Budget Implementation Act means the federal government can adopt the changes without comprehensive analysis, hearings or debate by Parliament."

-"potential for changes to the Fisheries Act to end up in litigation."

The Conservative government's energy policies and new energy developments will continue to come under public scrutiny, said the April, 2012, document.

Story continues below advertisement

"It will be important in this environment to increase public awareness and understanding of the Government's balanced approach to energy policy," the document said.

Among the objectives of the two-year newspaper, television, online and radio ad campaign was to promote the government's "balanced investments to secure Canada's energy future and that this will help grow our economy, maintain our quality of life, and sustain our social programs."

The Northern Gateway proposal would see pipelines linking Alberta oil sands to a tanker port in Kitimat, on B.C.'s north coast.

Project supporters say that diversifying the market for Canadian oil products beyond the U.S. – currently the only customer — will boost profits in the neighbourhood of $20-billion a year because currently producers are forced to sell to just one customer.

Project opponents, which include many first nations and conservation groups, say the pipeline poses too great a risk to the environment, in particular off the B.C. coast where it would result in more than 200 oil tankers a year traversing the waters around the Haida Gwaii archipelago.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said the ad campaign relays facts to the public.

Story continues below advertisement

"The advertisements provide specific facts about measures taken by the government to protect the environment, and other information on Responsible Resource Development," Mr. Oliver said in an e-mail.

Natural Resources Canada has an advertising budget of $9-million for this fiscal year, according to a previous report by The Canadian Press.

Mr. Oliver said all details of the ad campaign will be published in the annual report on government advertising activities.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies