Skip to main content

Hollow log is frame for otherwise conventional beach shot, sand, water, North Shore Mountains. Shot in January when beach and water are uncrowded.

Don Wilkie/Don Wilkie

A proposed recovery house is a step closer to being built on the North Shore after opponents failed to gather enough signatures to force a referendum on the facility.

Under a process known as "alternate approval," residents opposed to the project had been given until Jan. 28 to collect and submit objections to a bylaw that would allow the site – currently set aside for park purposes – to be rezoned and leased to a non-profit society.

Under the process, opponents would have had to collect response forms from about 6,000 people – or 10 per cent of voters in the district – to force a referendum.

Story continues below advertisement

Responses have yet to be officially tallied but were "well short" of the threshold required, District of North Vancouver Councillor Doug MacKay-Dunn said on Tuesday.

That clears the way for the district to proceed to the next steps, which include a public hearing and ultimately rezoning of the site, a lot on Lloyd Avenue that borders Murdo Frazer Park.

The district bought the property in 1969 and has retained it for park use but now wants to rezone it and lease it to Turning Point Recovery Society, a Vancouver-based group that runs recovery houses in Vancouver and Richmond.

Some residents had objected to the rezoning, suggesting it would set a worrisome precedent for park property.

"We're going to make sure that all those individuals who expressed their concern and discontent in terms of this initiative will be invited," Mr. MacKay-Dunn said. "It's important that the community clearly understand what they're getting.

"In terms of the park area, we're just adding a use to a park zone," he said.

The proposed recovery house would have nine beds and serve women who are recovering from alcohol and drug addiction. Vancouver Coastal Health and B.C. Housing are also involved in the project.

Story continues below advertisement

Currently, there are no residential recovery facilities for men or women on the North Shore.

Sean Wightman, a long-time resident in the neighbourhood, remains opposed to the project, saying he has concerns about the process the district used to make the site available and the lack of nearby transit.

"For obvious reasons, I am concerned about the process, because it's kind of a loophole they can use to their advantage for other projects," said Mr. Wightman. "It's a good location for the serenity of it all – but there's no public transit, it's not easy to get to."

Mr. Wightman also voiced concerns about construction's effects on a nearby spring, saying spawning salmon have returned to the waterway in recent years. Salmon had disappeared for decades in the wake of highway construction in the neighbourhood.

"The district owns dozens of properties they could use that are not in an area that has the challenges that this one has, as far as being in a park and being hard to get to," Mr. Wightman said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.