Skip to main content

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, front, appears with (left to right) Surrey Fire Chief Len Garis, Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu, New Westminster Police Chief Dave Jones and Vancouver Fire Chief John McKearney, at a news conference where the chiefs announced their support for a Yes vote in the transit tax referendum, in Surrey, B.C., on March 11, 2015.

Darryl Dyck/The Globe and Mail

Some Vancouver-region police and fire chiefs have entered the debate over a proposed new tax to pay for regional transit expansion, saying a Yes vote in a plebiscite on the issue would lead to better roads and light rail that could help save lives and fight crime.

But as the emergency services commanders, including Vancouver's police chief, waded into the controversial political issue on Wednesday, the RCMP, which polices several Lower Mainland communities, said it was not appropriate to intervene.

"It's not the RCMP's practice to attempt to influence public opinion on any referendum or plebiscite. We remain neutral on how the money is raised," Inspector Ed Boettcher, an RCMP spokesperson, said in an e-mail exchange with The Globe and Mail.

Story continues below advertisement

That view was echoed by the police department for the district municipality of Delta. "Once the citizens of British Columbia have voted on the issue, and the outcome and its potential impact on the community of Delta is known, we will adjust our policing model as necessary," Acting Sergeant Sarah Swallow said in a statement.

That hands-off policy was at odds with the advocacy of the police chiefs of Vancouver and New Westminster, as well as the fire chiefs of Surrey and Vancouver. At a news conference in Surrey, they called for a Yes vote in the plebiscite on a proposed 0.5-per-cent regional addition to the 7-per-cent provincial sales tax. More than 1.5 million ballots are being sent to registered voters next week. Voting ends in May, and the results are expected in June.

The tax would help raise money to pay for a decade of transit expansion that would include a new Vancouver subway, light rail in Surrey, as well as improvements to roads.

Surrey Fire Chief Len Garis called the new tax a "critical investment" in the ability of first responders to deal with emergency calls. "It will improve public safety," Chief Garis said.

He said that new road development is required to combat gridlock as the population of the Lower Mainland increases, and that projects linked to the planned decade of development would cut regional congestion by 20 per cent.

Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu added that improved transit would help to clear thousands of revellers, some impaired, from the downtown Granville Street-entertainment area district on weekends.

"We believe late-night transit will provide a means for people to disperse and get home safely," Chief Chu said. "That will improve public safety." He said his department is also worried about congestion on roads interfering with police travel times to emergency calls.

Story continues below advertisement

Chief Chu said he decided to take a stand on his own without the urging of Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, chair of the Mayors Council on regional transportation, who attended the event. Chief Chu said he would vote Yes, but he was not ordering officers to do so.

Dave Jones, the New Westminster police chief, said that his role is inevitably "quasi-political at times" and that his department has concluded dealing with congestion is a better option for improving service than hiring more officers.

Jordan Bateman, the B.C. director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation who has become the key spokesman for the No side, accused the Yes side of engaging in the "politics of fear" with the statement by police and fire commanders.

"In this campaign, [the Yes side have] threatened economic disaster, climate disaster, increased cancer rates and, now, apparently loss of public safety," Mr. Bateman said in a statement. "It's fearmongering and we think voters will see through it."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies