Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Rosa Liu, left, with a group of concerned residents and parents, protests against temporary modular housing in the Marpole neighbourhood on Tuesday. Some residents say they were blindsided by how fast the project moved and argued a public hearing should have been held.

Rafal Gerszak/The Globe and Mail

One day after the City of Vancouver approved a contentious temporary modular housing development on the city's south side, a handful of protesters blocked driveway entrances to the property, forcing the delay of planned site preparations.

The 78-unit development in the Marpole neighbourhood has been billed as a quick and affordable way to house some of the city's most vulnerable people. But some residents of the area say they were blindsided by the speed at which the project moved and argued that a public hearing should have been held.

(A recent bylaw change removed the requirement for temporary modular housing to go before a public hearing as long as the land does not require rezoning.)

Story continues below advertisement

On Tuesday, a handful of people held signs with slogans such as "Return my public hearing right" and "We want a say."

Ann Mukai was among those at the proposed site, currently an empty lot owned by the development company Onni. It is located in a quiet residential area across from an elementary school and a small secondary school.

Ms. Mukai, whose three young children attend the elementary school, said her concern is that there is a requirement for a percentage of the tenants to fall into what is known as "service level 3," a category that includes people with extensive criminal histories and are at high-risk to reoffend, and people who "can create security problems through aggressive and intimidating behaviour," according to a city document.

The Sept. 25 document notes that "the housing provider will be expected to house a minimum of 20 per cent of the most vulnerable homeless individuals who will fit into the service level 3 category."

"If people are homeless, if they've hit a rough patch, I get it. I have an aunt who's almost there," Ms. Mukai said. "But if you're going to put service-level-3 people there across from elementary school kids … it's not cool. Incidents that happen will be critical to little kids."

Gil Kelley, the city's general manager of planning, urban design and sustainability, on Tuesday said he granted temporary approval to the five-year development with residents' specific concerns about tenanting and community engagement in mind.

Conditions newly added to the development permit include a community advisory committee composed of community and parent advisory council members and a condition that the building operator consider best practices and local factors when tenanting, Mr. Kelley said.

Story continues below advertisement

He declined to comment further on a specific tenant mix.

"I want to leave that up to the process to determine how that will work," Mr. Kelley said.

"People certainly have a right to housing. This program is broad; it includes a number of sites throughout the city.

"What we've asked is, in that work, that the operator take care in terms of making a good fit with this neighbourhood and taking into account the local considerations."

Also at the site on Tuesday was Alex Morrison, a nearby resident who walks past the site daily on his way to and from school at Langara. He held a sign in support of the project.

"I always see these signs, and the protesters out here," Mr. Morrison said.

Story continues below advertisement

"I never saw anybody saying 'We support it,' so I just thought I'd take half an hour, come out here and show anybody who does care that there are people who support this."

Mr. Morrison said he trusts the vetting process and is troubled by his neighbours' attempts to keep certain people out.

"Diversity is ideal," he said. "We should have anybody who wants to live there, who needs a place, to live there. We should have more [developments] like that, frankly."

The Marpole development is part of a $66-million commitment from the B.C. government toward building a total of 600 temporary modular housing units in Vancouver.

Metro Vancouver's latest homeless count, released late September, found that 3,605 people in the region do not have homes, up from 2,777 during the last count three years ago. Of those, 2,138 were in the City of Vancouver.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies