Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A mountie in Richmond, B.C., on November 7, 2011.

Brett Beadle For The Globe and Mail

Every municipality in British Columbia that uses the RCMP as its local police force has now agreed to sign the latest contract, after Squamish, the final holdout, signalled that it will keep the Mounties. Squamish, halfway between Vancouver and Whistler, was among several municipalities that had delayed signing the new, 20-year agreement over concerns about local control and added costs within the contract.

The District of Squamish issued a news release on Friday that said while the community still has concerns, it will sign the deal.

The release suggested the district agreed only after the province informed it that not signing would lose the community $450,000 in funding. Under the contract, Squamish pays for 90 per cent of the cost of policing, while the federal government picks up the remaining 10 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

"We will continue to work with council, local residents, the provincial government and other municipalities to address our concerns with the policing contract," Mayor Rob Kirkham said in the news release.

"The safety and security of the people of Squamish is of paramount importance. We do not want to allow this process to place undue risk on our citizens."

B.C. and other provinces reached the agreement earlier this year, and British Columbia municipalities had until June 30 to sign on — the deadline had been extended twice since April.

The agreement included measures designed to give provinces and municipalities more control over how their local detachments spend money and operate, including greater say in the hiring of senior officers.

But some municipalities complained about wage increases contained in the contract and demanded even more control over RCMP officers in their communities.

Among Squamish's concerns were the costs associated with a new RCMP headquarters in Surrey, the costs for legal services and security costs for divisional and regional headquarters.

In May, municipal staff recommended councillors refuse to sign the contract unless those concerns were addressed, but it appears Squamish did not receive the concessions it demanded.

Story continues below advertisement

"The district was disappointed to have had so little input into a contract that commits our residents for 20 years," the district's news release says.

The loudest objections came from Burnaby, Richmond, Port Coquitlam and the city and district of North Vancouver.

All of them eventually agreed to sign the contract, but they also joined together to launch a two-year study into whether the RCMP is worth keeping.

If they decide to ditch the force, they can trigger a two-year opt-out clause. They would then have to either start their own police department, invite another municipal force to take over, or work with other cities to create a regional force. Ladysmith was listed among the communities that hadn't agreed to the new contract, but the town announced Thursday that it will sign. Mayor Rob Hutchins explained the delay was related to funding for a recently built RCMP detachment, and that issue had been sorted out. Only 11 municipalities in B.C. have their own police force. The rest of the province is policed by the single-largest contingent of RCMP officers of any province.

Under the RCMP contract, small communities with fewer than 15,000 residents split the cost of policing with the federal government, with the municipality paying 70 per cent.

Larger cities pay 90 per cent.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies