Skip to main content

The Salmon River on central Vancouver Island is a rarity in British Columbia, perhaps even in North America.

Like most other rivers on the West Coast, its once-famed salmon runs have declined because of habitat destruction and overfishing.

But unlike other rivers, the Salmon offers not only the opportunity for full restoration – but also the chance to actually make it more productive than it ever was.

Story continues below advertisement

The dream of most fisheries conservationists is to restore damaged watersheds to their natural productivity. But on the Salmon, the potential is bigger than that.

And nobody is pushing harder for change than Mike Gage, a tireless champion of salmon conservation. He is a representative of the Salmon River Fish and Game Association and chair of the Campbell River Salmon Foundation.

"We could really do something up there," says Mr. Gage of the Salmon, which rises as snow melts in Strathcona Park, and develops into one of the Island's larger rivers by the time it reaches Johnstone Strait, near the small town of Sayward.

"According to Fisheries and Oceans … we could increase coho production from 12,000 to 20,000 and could increase steelhead numbers by 30 per cent," he says.

A lot has already been done to restore the river. The provincial government has been working for decades at habitat restoration, hauling in boulder clusters to improve rearing habitat for young steelhead, removing log jams that were impassable to fish and fertilizing the river to replace the nutrients lost when the salmon population crashed.

In one brilliant move, in 1976, provincial fisheries workers blew up a huge boulder lodged in the throat of the Salmon River canyon, which had blocked migrating steelhead and salmon from reaching 12 kilometres of prime spawning habitat.

But Mr. Gage says the greatest opportunity for improvement has yet to be acted on.

Story continues below advertisement

A little over halfway up the Salmon River, above the canyon beyond which salmon once couldn't pass, is a BC Hydro diversion dam that deflects water down a canal to a nearby system; here, it is used to boost power generation.

That diversion dam, built in the late 1950s, blocks fish from colonizing the upper 40 kilometres kms of the Salmon River.

Over the years, some spawning fish did slip past the dam, and others were stocked, establishing a small population upstream. But each spring, most of the fry are killed or transferred into another watershed, when they get caught in the diversion canal while migrating downstream.

In the late 1980s, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans built a fish passageway around the dam. But subsequent studies showed that it never worked. Fish enter, but most are driven back or become trapped in the clashing currents.

A few years ago, Mr. Gage stood on the bank watching 200 coho mill in confusion at the base of the dam, throwing themselves against the concrete barrier. And he thought it was time to act.

Since then, Mr. Gage has spent years in meetings with the DFO, the province and other government agencies, debating the best way to solve the problem.

Story continues below advertisement

"You put in a proper fish passage, and you open up 40 kilometres of prime salmon habitat," he says. "It is that simple."

He argues that if a channel was blasted 90 metres through the rock, it would allow spawning fish to swim past. And if the diversion canal was closed for a few months in the spring, salmon fry could migrate out safely.

The proposals have been kicked around for 4 1/2 years at the meeting table. But there is still no decision. This fall, the salmon will be running into the same old road block when they head up the Salmon River to spawn.

"It's time to get going on this," says a frustrated Mr. Gage. "We shouldn't miss another salmon cycle by talking."

But James Coles, BC Hydro's area manager, says there are a number of possible solutions – from retrofitting the existing fish way to building a new one – and the matter has to be dealt with carefully.

"Once the need and potential solutions are identified … then BC Hydro will undertake a triple bottom line business decision, prioritizing the potential solution against other business needs," he stated in an e-mail. "If a single recommended option is deemed suitable, a feasibility study will become part of the proposed business plan. BC Hydro will then evaluate and prioritize with existing processes for potential implementation."

That is a very business like approach. But it is also a very slow one. The opportunity to open the upper Salmon River became available when the province blew out the canyon blockage, 35 years ago. So why are the salmon still waiting?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter