Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The tax increases and fare hikes may be modest – a few dollars here, an extra couple of dimes in the fare box. But Lower Mainland mayors did something this week they swore they would not do: They turned to property taxes to fund the first phase of their 10-year transit plan.

What's more, regional transportation authority TransLink is picking up the lion's share of the $2-billion cost, with the federal government contributing $370-million and the province kicking in $246-million.

It's a far cry from the one third-one third-one third formula the mayors and the province have talked so much about, the sort of formula that funded the long-awaited Evergreen Line, which was approved by the TransLink board 10 years ago and is finally set to begin service on Dec. 2. In that case, the province ended up picking up about $100-million more than its share of the $1.4-billion cost.

Story continues below advertisement

Yes, it's good that all levels of government have finally agreed to move forward on transit improvements. And yes, it's good that the federal government's contribution appears to have been what finally got the wheels in motion. But adding more buses and SkyTrain cars and even a third SeaBus isn't going to solve the Lower Mainland's transportation woes. It's a start – the modest scope of the improvements means services can be put into place relatively quickly – but given where the system is now, I'm guessing demand will outstrip supply as soon as any new services are introduced. We're playing catch-up. Anyone who has waited for a train at the Commercial-Broadway station or has ridden the Canada Line in the morning knows this.

Most municipalities have dutifully followed the regional growth strategy – concentrating density along the major transit routes. But with the rate of development in Burnaby and the planned developments at Oakridge, the former RCMP "E" Division lands and the Coast Mountain Bus Company property in Vancouver, demand for transit is about to take a giant leap forward. And I haven't even mentioned the areas south of the Fraser River not served by rapid transit.

Because of the state of the transit services, and with the failure of last year's referendum, the Mayors' Council had little choice but to turn to property taxes and the fare box. The province forced them into it.

Remember the province's $14-billion transit plan unveiled by then-premier Gordon Campbell in 2008? I do. It was a big day. At its core was $10.3-billion dedicated to the Evergreen Line, a new UBC Line and improvements to rapid transit. An additional $1.3-billion would go toward a new fleet of clean-energy buses. The plan, we were told at the time, would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 4.7 million tonnes by 2020. It would get people out of their cars and on to transit.

What we need now is that kind of commitment – but this time we need the province to actually follow through on it. What we have instead is TransLink and the Mayors' Council hamstrung by the insistence that any new source of funding require another referendum.

Peter Fassbender, the minister responsible for TransLink, told me this week that he is ready to sit down with the mayors and look at long-term transit needs. He also said he's ready to hear ideas about new sources of revenue, but he didn't change his tune on a referendum.

I suppose it could be argued that the tolls charged to cross the 10-lane bridge that will replace the Massey Tunnel are a new source of revenue, but the province hasn't seen fit to put the bridge's $3.5-billion price tag to Lower Mainland voters.

Story continues below advertisement

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson reminded me that some of the money announced this week will go toward the engineering and planning of new rapid transit lines for Vancouver and Surrey. But I'm not holding my breath.

The 10-year Evergreen Line process and the debacle that preceded the construction of the Canada Line are sure to be repeated. History tells me that.

Stephen Quinn is the host of On the Coast on CBC Radio One, 690 AM and 88.1 FM in Vancouver.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies