Skip to main content

A firefighter hikes to a new position while battling a wildfire in Peachland, B.C., on Monday September 10, 2012.

Darryl Dick/The Canadian Press

British Columbia is facing droughts more severe than any in the past 350 years, according to new research that used tree-ring data to reconstruct the coastal climate back to the 17th century.

The study suggests recent droughts in the West – which have dried up streams, led to provincewide restrictions on water use, and triggered intense fire seasons – are likely to be surpassed by more severe events in the next few decades.

Bethany Coulthard, a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Arizona, collected tree-ring data from old-growth forests in three watersheds on Vancouver Island and one on the Lower Mainland.

Story continues below advertisement

By studying the growth rates in two different sets of trees, one that reflected snowpack levels in winter and another that indicated hot, dry summers, she and her colleagues reconstructed what conditions were like dating back to 1666.

"In the one set, a [narrow] ring means a deep snowpack, and higher run off from snowmelt water, and then in the other set a [narrow] ring means drier conditions, the tree is thirsty, it's not getting enough moisture, so it tells us about the summer aridity conditions," Dr. Coulthard said in an interview on Wednesday.

"You can combine those two data sets and use them to tell you about summer drought conditions in every year, going back over the length of the tree-ring record," she said.

The data showed that British Columbia experienced 16 droughts more severe than any since the 1970s, when climatologists began using instruments to record weather and climate information.

"Our reconstruction suggests that preinstrumental droughts were more severe than those in 1992, 1996, 2003 and 2009, when water scarcity throughout south coastal B.C. severely impacted municipal, hydroelectric, and agricultural water supplies," her research paper says.

Data from the 2014 and 2015 droughts in British Columbia were not available in time to be included.

But Dr. Coulthard said the record, which includes a period before climate change and before widespread logging, clearly shows that British Columbia can expect worse droughts in the years ahead.

Story continues below advertisement

"What the model does not account for is [human-caused] climate change or land-use change like deforestation, urbanization, these other pressures that also lend themselves to drought," Dr. Coulthard said.

"So when we take the projected climate change and we take the projected land-use change and we put them on top of the 16 worst-case scenario droughts, it is reasonable to assume that all those factors combined would translate into a drought that would be worse than anything we've seen over the period of the reconstruction, which was 350 years."

The tree-ring data show droughts occurred about every 21 years on average, and the three most severe were in 1674, 1682 and 1958.

The droughts did not occur in two consecutive years except for 1868 and 1869.

The past two summers in British Columbia have been extremely dry, with water restrictions throughout Metro Vancouver and many other jurisdictions. Current U.S. long-range forecasts by AccuWeather, Inc. predict drought conditions "may return in the middle and latter part of summer and may result in another year of rampant wildfires for northern California and the Northwest."

This spring has been hot and dry in British Columbia, and water restrictions are to start on May 15 in Metro Vancouver, two weeks earlier than last year. But the snowpack throughout most the province has been average, or slightly above average, except on the Central Coast, and in the north and northeast regions of the province, where it was below average.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Coulthard said while the tree-ring data clearly showed when droughts occurred, they did not indicate to researchers just how low the streams got.

"It is really hard to say exactly how bad the droughts were in terms of actual streamflow measurements, like how low did the water get? We can't really answer that question. But what we can say is that they were worse, they were lower than in anything in the severe drought years we've seen," she said.

Dr. Coulthard, who got her Ph.D. from the University of Victoria, worked on the research project with Dan Smith of UVic's tree ring laboratory, and David Meko of the University of Arizona. Their paper is in the Journal of Hydrology.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.