Skip to main content

Premier Christy Clark during press conference in Vancouver November 12, 2013 where she announced an agreement to build an LNG facility at Grassy Point near Prince Rupert.

John Lehmann/The Globe and Mail

Premier Christy Clark's Liberals won last year's B.C. election by appealing to the economic development dreams of voters in the province's regions, but a new study by Statistics Canada's former chief economic analyst has found that most of the jobs created by resource extraction will be in the Vancouver area.

Philip Cross, writing for the new non-profit Resource Works, used 2010 data to examine what would happen if B.C.'s economy grew by 10 per cent in a year, and found more than 29,000 jobs would be created.

"The results will surprise many," Mr. Cross wrote, noting the jobs created will be well-paying and full-time. "The Lower Mainland garners just over 50 per cent of all jobs flowing from the growth of B.C.'s natural resource sector."

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Clark has estimated an economy fired by new LNG development would generate a trillion dollars in economic opportunity that would eventually create 100,000 jobs. Her election job-creation plan hinged on resource development in B.C.'s north, in particular as a result of LNG development.

While Mr. Cross's study notes that rural areas of B.C. will benefit from the extraction of natural resources, particularly in the forestry, fishing and mining industries, the spinoff from an increased demand for services will also benefit Vancouver and the Lower Mainland.

"When the resource sector expands, it's going to need more business services, legal services, engineering services, accounting services," Mr. Cross said. "These firms are in the Lower Mainland. That's where the bulk of these jobs are created."

John Winter of the B.C. Chamber of Commerce noted that Vancouver is the "epicentre" of the service industries that support the resource sector, and although the LNG industry is still in the planning stages, jobs in those areas are already being created.

"All these companies coming in to set up shop in the LNG sector are bringing with them huge gobs of dollars to hire the lawyers, accountants and researchers to do the work," Mr. Winter said. "While we think only about the physical jobs that go into building a pipeline or a shipping dock, this work is already under way and being performed right here in Vancouver."

Mr. Winter said that despite the study's conclusions that B.C.'s remote regions will see less job growth, they stand to profit from an increase in resource extraction.

"The economic benefits are not just in jobs – it's in the taxes paid to the government that can then be translated into the goods and services that the north doesn't have an abundance of," Mr. Winter said. "The north stands to benefit hugely from this."

Story continues below advertisement

Peter Hall, an associate professor in the Urban Studies program at Simon Fraser University, said the relationship between resource extraction and the creation of jobs within the province is less direct than it used to be.

"Many of these activities look to Vancouver for services," Dr. Hall said, "but increasingly, these are globalized industries that might be looking halfway across the world for services.

"There are connections, and the study has pointed them out, but these relationships are much more hidden and complicated and aren't as obvious or easy to trace."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter