Skip to main content

Some traditional stores are shown in Chinatown on East Pender Street in Vancouver. Voters in San Francisco have approved creation of a fund to help support historic businesses.

Deborah Baic/The Globe and Mail

The city's historic Chinatown may get even more protections and new rules, from a limit on the density and a non-negotiable requirement for seniors' housing in new residential projects to a possible designation of the neighbourhood as a heritage-conservation area.

Those are some of the ideas being explored this week in community workshops, as city planners continue to try to look for the right formula to preserve the history and traditional businesses in the more than 100-year-old neighbourhood while allowing for new life.

"Over the last four years, we've heard from the public that they're concerned about the loss of character in Chinatown," said Karen Hoese, whose planning team ran a workshop on Saturday and will do another one Tuesday on the possible changes.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Vancouver's new chief planner says city is ripe for change

Related: Changes to Vancouver's Chinatown welcoming for some, wrenching for others

The city's moves are being welcomed by a group that has been advocating vigorously for changes over the last few years.

"We hope the city has heard us and there are some strategies to put the brakes on a little bit," said Doris Chow, a co-founder of the Youth Collaborative for Chinatown.

A city plan passed in 2012 ensured that the blocks along East Pender Street, lined with Victorian-era buildings put up by Chinatown's clan associations, would be protected.

But the plan encouraged new development and higher building heights along Main Street, in return for some community benefits for developers.

Three large condo buildings quickly went up. But many people felt like they didn't fit in with Chinatown's look.

Story continues below advertisement

As well, there was concern about what the community got back. One developer's project provided 22 units of social housing. Another's contributed $1.3-million to be used for refurbishing existing low-income units in the area.

Now, said Ms. Hoese, planners are considering reducing the allowable density – though not heights – for buildings.

Both Chinatown and Gastown have never had density caps, so that anyone proposing a project there could pack in as much built space as possible on the lot, as long as the design didn't break the height limit.

But, she said, that's created some problems with bulky buildings on bigger sites that have been assembled from the typical small Chinatown lots.

"People are developing the buildings trying to squeeze in as much as they can. One of our objectives is to set realistic expectations about the density for the developers."

That conflict over density has surfaced several times as a fourth project, by Beedie Development, has gone through the approval process.

Story continues below advertisement

At its last round at the urban-design panel, members said that the building had some nice architectural elements, but it was just too big.

Ms. Hoese said another change being considered is a requirement to provide social or seniors' housing in every project. At the moment, developers have to provide some kind of community benefit but it's always been a negotiation what that will be.

She said the city is considering simply demanding a fixed percentage of units in every project, likely around 20 or 25 per cent.

And, she said, planners are "exploring the idea of a heritage-conservation area," like Shaughnessy.

Something that's not being considered in this round, but will be part of a bigger-picture plan for community economic development in the whole Downtown Eastside area, including Chinatown, is whether there should be limits on new types of businesses coming in and more support for local-serving and traditional businesses.

San Francisco recently announced it will start new initiatives to preserve "legacy" businesses in the city, after almost 4,000 businesses closed in 2014. Voters approved an initiative last November to create a fund that could be used to support unique and historic businesses.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Chow said she would like to see Vancouver consider something similar. Although some Chinatown businesses are shutting down as the owners get old or they feel their customer base has dwindled, others are being pushed out by increased rents.

"They would like to stay," she said. And a move to support those heritage businesses "can help protect some."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter