Skip to main content

A cyclist makes her way along Point Grey Road in Vancouver, British Columbia, Wednesday, July 17, 2013.

Rafal Gerszak/Rafal Gerszak

The people who hate your plan threaten to vote you out of office. They accuse your staff of lying about statistics. They say you are arrogant and do not listen to the community. They say you are being bought off by a few rich folks.

In the face of that, when does a city councillor decide it is time to back down and abandon an idea, and when – as Vancouver city council did on Monday in approving a bike route in the western beaches – do they say, "In spite of the vocal objections, we're going ahead with what we think is best for the city?"

Former city councillor Gordon Price maintains that, if about a third of the people who come out to council support your idea, that is a strong enough sign.

Story continues below advertisement

"In a very emotional and often hostile environment, if 30 per cent of the speakers have made the effort to come out in spite of the opposition, that means the community support is probably there," said Mr. Price, who was a councillor with the city's once-dominant centre-right party and is now a vocal cycling and transit advocate.

Mr. Price's words were something that Vision councillors took to heart as they faced almost 150 speakers over the past week, at least half or more of them saying that they adamantly opposed the plan for a Point Grey/Kits bike route and greenway.

Those councillors also reminded themselves of two things: What did you tell people your priorities were in the last election? Does anything in this plan need a serious fix?

"It's really hard to sit and listen to people who are upset and angry," said Councillor Heather Deal, who introduced the final motion on Monday to approve the plan. "It's wearing. But you look at city policies and the things you ran on – like being the greenest city, like the Transportation 2040 plan – and you rely on that."

Although Councillor George Affleck, who tried to get the project decision deferred until October, said that about 70 per cent of the speakers at five nights of council meetings were opposed, Ms. Deal said that it was more like 60 or even 55 per cent.

She also said she believes there was a lot of misinformation, which made people fearful about things that will never happen.

That makes her confident that, once the new route is in place, people will see it is nothing like the vehicular disaster they imagine.

Story continues below advertisement

Other previous councillors from both parties say they have had to make the same kinds of difficult decisions, realizing that just because a lot of opponents come out to speak, that does not mean they are the majority or in the right.

Mr. Price said that moderate supporters often get scared off from speaking publicly because the opponents can seem so intimidating. So when they do step up, their opinions get extra points.

He said that experienced councillors also understand that it is rare to make an important decision without heated debate.

"There's the trap people fall into, thinking that anything that's controversial means something is wrong with the process."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter