Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A message written on the plywood covering the windows of the damaged Hudson's Bay Company store in Vancouver, B.C., on Thursday June 16, 2011.

DARRYL DYCK

Vancouver's mayor and chief of police are disavowing any failure on their part to avoid the biggest riot in the city's modern history, even as security experts - including one who wrote a postmortem on the last Stanley Cup riot in 1994 - raise questions about complacent and inadequate preparations.

Mayor Gregor Robertson laid the blame for the Wednesday riot on a small group of determined vandals who had a scheme to rampage through Vancouver, with his office saying police had identified several violent protesters from the Olympic Games. The mayor and police base that assessment on the gear some people brought into the Stanley Cup celebration zones in the downtown, including hammers, balaclavas, and lighter fluid.

"That group was at the core of it. They are the hoodlums who started the problem. … They were there to commit crimes and wreak havoc," Mr. Robertson charged.

Story continues below advertisement

But the co-author of a B.C. Police Commission report on the city's last night of sports infamy said more than violent vandals are to blame for the destruction: Police failed to learn the lessons from that earlier rampage.

"Complacency, apathy, denial, that's what I saw last night," Bob Whitelaw said.

He said he is disappointed at the time it took for police to react to the initial outbreak, and that vehicles and potential projectiles should have been removed from the areas where crowds were expected to mass. Another security expert, Steve Summerville, president of Ontario-based Stay Safe Instructional Program and a former Toronto police staff sergeant, questioned why more officers weren't on the ground.

Vancouver police, however, are refusing to issue a precise count of how many officers were deployed, saying only that "hundreds" were deployed for a crowd pushing toward 100,000. Asked why more riot police had not been assigned downtown, Mr. Robertson said the number was based on two months of experience policing the outdoor crowds. But Mr. Robertson said what happened Wednesday night was a "very different beast."

Unlike the Olympics, Mr. Robertson said, police did not have a billion dollars worth of security that could do intelligence work ahead of time.

Television footage and witness accounts of Vancouver's riot on Wednesday do show some vandals outfitted with the arsenal of anarchists, but there were also hundreds armed with nothing more than impromptu weapons, including ice-laden drinking cups.

Heading into Game 7, Vancouver had a pair of collective memories: the joyful outdoor celebration of the 2010 Olympics, where thousands commingled in celebration; and the dark experience of 1994, when, then as now, a Stanley Cup loss plunged the heart of the city into chaos.

Story continues below advertisement

Critics say the city should have been better prepared for the second scenario and, as Mr. Whitelaw notes, wonder whether the Olympic experience instilled a false sense of security.

Until Wednesday night, the city had handled - without serious incident - vast downtown crowds of up to 100,000 people, watching the Canucks' run to the Stanley Cup on jumbo video screens in fenced-off fan zones.

The overwhelmingly peaceful results when the hockey team won echoed the spirit of the throngs in the streets during the 2010 Winter Games.

Using "meet and greet" tactics that worked successfully during the Olympics and run-up to Wednesday night's game, which had police mingling with the crowds and high-fiving celebrants, police were confident they had turned the corner at avoiding violence.

But always, lurking in the background, were fears of a repeat of the 1994 outbreak of violence that also followed a loss by the Canucks in the seventh game of a Stanley Cup final.

Today, the mayor, along with much of the city, is suffering collective shame and embarrassment as media across the world pick up on Vancouver's second outbreak of hockey hooliganism. In order to avoid a repeat, the city will search for an explanation from a confection of factors: rampant alcohol consumption, large numbers of excitable young men crammed into a fenced-off space, an emotional loss, too few police officers - and an over-reliance on the positive outdoor experience of the Olympics and previous playoff games.

Story continues below advertisement

Unlike the Stanley Cup riots in 1994 that followed a similar final game loss by the Canucks, trouble started the moment the game ended.

A car was quickly overturned and torched - the first of several - fistfights broke out, and port-a-potties trashed. There was no slow start to violence. It was immediate, and escalated for hours.



With reports from Sunny Dhillon and Mark Hume

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies