Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Blackjack dealer Rebecca Lehman at the St. Eugene Casino in Cranbrook, B.C., February 20, 2013.

John Lehmann/The Globe and Mail

Part of The Big Gamble, a series examining British Columbia's complicated relationship with casinos.

Given the track record of recent casino proposals in British Columbia, it might seem the appetite for such projects has run its course.

Vancouver nixed an expanded casino in 2011. Surrey voted down a $100-million casino complex in January. Despite those rebuffs, Joe Hall looks around the province and sees open arms.

Story continues below advertisement

That's because he's looking at the terrain from his viewpoint as chairman of the British Columbia First Nations Gaming Initiative, a group set up to push for a bigger native role in the provincial gambling sector. Having spent the past couple of years trying – and failing – to persuade the province to change its policies, the first-nations gambling committee said it's ready to act on its own, by setting up gambling operations on reserve land and risking potential consequences, including possible legal action by B.C. or Ottawa.

Unlike other provinces, including Manitoba and Alberta, B.C. has not developed policies to share gambling revenue with natives.

"The province and, to some degree, the federal government just don't seem to be interested in doing it the easy way," Mr. Hall said.

B.C. first-nation groups have been lobbying for a share of gambling revenue since at least 1993. Plans for a provincial First Nations Gaming Commission got under way in 2010. Mr. Hall expects the group to be formalized and commissioners named this year.

To date, the B.C. government has declined to change course, saying the gambling sector is already close to saturation. The only native-owned casino in B.C. is part of the St. Eugene Resort near Cranbrook.

"This is not a business where, if you build it they will come," said Rich Coleman, minister responsible for gambling. "Some people think that's the case but it really isn't; you have to have it sized to the marketplace."

First nations understand the concept of market saturation, Mr. Hall retorts. That's why they were angered by the proposed casino in Surrey – which, had it been approved, would have gone up near where the Semiahmoo First Nation was mulling a casino development of its own.

Story continues below advertisement

"It was on their [Semiahmoo Nation] traditional territory, they hadn't been consulted and it would have had a direct impact on them. And they had spoken about a casino years ago and really made no progress with the provincial government," Mr. Hall said.

The committee is looking at sites in areas including Vancouver Island and the Okanagan. As for capital, Mr. Hall said the group has that lined up as well, in the form of partners willing to invest.

In Canada, 15 native-owned casinos operate under various provincial regimes, ranging from Ontario's centralized model – natives share revenue from the Casino Rama operation near Orillia – to ones that feature several casinos, as in Saskatchewan.

There are pros and cons to every model but all – except B.C. – feature revenue-sharing, said Yale Belanger, an associate professor of native American studies at the University of Lethbridge who has written extensively on native gambling.

As to whether casinos have delivered the economic benefits first nations hoped for, results are mixed.

Management fees and debt-servicing costs take a big chunk of profits. So do provincial governments. Alberta, for example, takes a 30-per-cent cut of revenues generated by native casinos – a percentage that Dr. Belanger maintains should be reduced.

Story continues below advertisement

"Even though there are dollars now circulating in these [aboriginal] communities, there's a substantial portion that should be making it to those communities that isn't," Dr. Belanger said.

The location of B.C. first nations near or in sizable urban centres in the Lower Mainland, the Okanagan and elsewhere in the province would suggest there is potential for profitable native-owned casinos, he said. But the political terrain is less inviting.

"B.C. in terms of its lack of response is indicating that first nations don't fit into their gambling plans," Dr. Belanger said.

Mr. Hall, meanwhile, said his committee has been talking to counterparts in other provinces to learn from their experiences in finding operators, building facilities and setting up sound financial and management systems.

"We have the luxury of someone else walking through all those spiderwebs and maybe clearing a bit of a path for us."

With a report from Justine Hunter in Victoria

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies