Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

The B.C. government was preparing to release a progress report on worker safety in forest-product mills earlier this month when an explosion ripped through a wood-pellet plant in Burns Lake, injuring three workers.

The update would have trumpeted how the government is making progress on a series of recommendations to improve workplace safety – changes designed to make sure the circumstances that led to two deadly sawmill explosions two years ago would never be repeated.

Instead, Shirley Bond, the minister responsible for WorkSafeBC, found herself on Oct. 9 answering questions about how a third incident could happen.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Bond vowed to make forest-sector workers safer after the explosions in 2012, including one in her hometown of Prince George. The incidents left four men dead, dozens more injured and exposed a widespread hazard of combustible sawdust.

The government and WorkSafeBC continue to investigate what happened at the Pinnacle Renewable Energy Inc. facility in Burns Lake earlier this month and it may well be that the Pinnacle explosion has nothing in common with previous two.

What is clear, however, is that the government was aware that the pellet industry in B.C. is struggling to manage safety risks.

WorkSafeBC ramped up inspections of the province's 85 sawmills after the Babine Forest Products mill in Burns Lake was levelled and the Lakeland mill in Prince George was destroyed three months later. Last spring, the enforcement drive targeting combustible dust was expanded to include 15 other wood-product facilities including the province's wood-pellet manufacturers.

The wood-pellet industry is inherently high-risk. Truckloads of sawdust are conveyed through a mill to be compressed into fuel pellets. The whole process disperses combustible dust, which is easily ignited.

Inspectors visited two pellet mills in April and both failed tests. At that point, the inspections stopped. The owners of all the mills were brought in to be reminded about the hazards of combustible sawdust.

It is difficult to comprehend that in 2014, there might be a single operator of any kind of wood-products mill in B.C. who wouldn't be aware of the explosion risk of poorly managed sawdust. But even after that intervention, when the inspections resumed, only four of the 10 mills passed inspection. (Pinnacle's Burns Lake plant, although it had been fined for violations in 2013, was one of the four that was in compliance.)

Story continues below advertisement

Gord Macatee explained part of the problem in his report to government in July, which included 43 recommendations. Ms. Bond had planned to report on their progress this month.

Mr. Macatee was brought into WorkSafeBC to repair the regulator's shattered reputation after the sawmill explosions in 2012. The agency responsible for workplace safety hadn't prevented the incidents that it later concluded were preventable. Then, it couldn't get charges against the mills' owners to stick because it botched its investigations.

In his report, Mr. Macatee concluded the agency needs more clout to get compliance from the industries it regulates.

Penalties are slow to come and often too light, it is too difficult to obtain a stop-work order when worker safety is compromised and no one has been successfully prosecuted for putting employees at risk, he wrote. The agency responsible for worker safety can't deter scofflaw employers.

"There is a record of one operator who has had several hundred orders written, penalties assessed that have not been paid, and has been in front of a judge for an injunction application, but this operator is still in business and putting worker health and safety at risk," he wrote. (WorkSafeBC won't identify that employer.)

Ms. Bond has accepted Mr. Macatee's recommendations and may be drafting legislative changes this fall. But he also included a warning that she needs to address: "WorkSafeBC cannot sustain the recent level of direct oversight on the combustible dust issue or important work in other sectors can be expected to suffer," he wrote.

Story continues below advertisement

Does WorkSafeBC need more resources, or does government expect the forest industry to manage these continued problems on its own?

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies