Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

After Generation X and Generation Y, here comes a new name for young Canadians: Generation Squeeze.

A British Columbia study finds that young families in the country are facing growing financial and time pressures even as their baby-boomer elders head into easier-than-ever retirement.

It all has the makings of a "silent generational crisis," according to researchers.

Story continues below advertisement

"The baby boomers as parents lucked out, and their children for the first time will not enjoy the same standard of living as their parents," said Paul Kershaw, a political scientist at the University of British Columbia. "It's become hard to raise a young family and easier to retire."

Prof. Kershaw, an associate professor at the Human Early Learning Partnership, released a study on Tuesday with colleague Lynell Anderson showing that new families today have a lower standard of living than the baby-boomer generation, even though the Canadian economy has doubled in size since 1976.

And while the share of young women contributing to household incomes is up 53 per cent, average household incomes for young couples overall have remained static since the mid-1970s, after adjusting for inflation. Yet housing prices during the same period rose 76 per cent nationwide.

That's left Canadian parents raising young kids today squeezed for time, money and child-care services, Prof. Kershaw said.

"What we have now is Generation Squeeze," he said.

It's a far rosier picture for boomers, according to the study. Compared to their counterparts in the 1970s, they're heading into retirement well off because the housing market has nearly doubled over their adult lives, the study shows.

"They're approaching retirement with higher incomes and more wealth than any previous generation of retirees," Prof. Kershaw said.

Story continues below advertisement

The findings come as no surprise to young Canadians who have grown up in the shadow of the demographic juggernaut of the baby-boom generation.

Louis-François Brodeur, a 32-year-old PhD management student in Montreal, says the study resonates with a generation tackling growing debt and shrinking services.

"Between student debts, precarious jobs, the public debt and tough access to homes, it's normal to feel cornered," said Mr. Brodeur, head of a Quebec group called Force Jeunesse, which studies policy issues around young workers in the province. "I don't want to call it a war between the generations, but young people know we're going to have to find solutions. [Baby boomers] are very numerous and there are fewer of us."

Rémi Bourget, a 29-year-old Montreal lawyer with a six-month-old baby at home, says his generation faces the "worst of both worlds" with high taxes coupled with growing user fees for health care and other services.

"I'm paying the debt for the previous generation – plus I'm paying for their retirement and health-care costs," he said. "These are our parents and grandparents, but we feel like we're cleaning up after their mess, while normally it's parents who clean up after their children's mess."

The gap between haves and have-nots is playing itself out at Occupy Wall Street protests across North America, and it can only be addressed by tackling tensions between the generations, Prof. Kershaw said. But young Canadians can't just blame boomers for their woes; they need to follow their elders by becoming more politically engaged, he said. That means turning out to vote.

Story continues below advertisement

"They need to care less about who's being voted off some island on TV," he said, "and more about who's being voted into our legislatures."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies