Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

iStockphoto/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Canada's medical-aid-in-dying law could save the country's health-care system as much as $138.8-million a year, depending on the number of people who chose to hasten their deaths with the help of a doctor or nurse.

That's according to a new analysis that looked at the likely costs and potential savings of assisted dying, and concluded the practice "should not result in any excess financial burden to the health-care system, and could result in substantial savings."

The authors of the paper, which was published Monday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, were quick to stress that money should not factor into the decision-making of patients or physicians when it comes to assisted dying.

Story continues below advertisement

Kim's Choice: Inside one woman's decision to starve herself to death

Gary Mason: A suicide note that should be read by everyone

As a person with mental illness, here's why I support medically assisted death

But they said provincial health departments that are already grappling with the costs of medical-aid-in-dying (MAID) – doctors have to be paid, lethal drugs have to be purchased – need to have some sense of how assisted dying might affect their bottom lines.

"We're not asking people involved in the individual decisions to offer or provide MAID to consider cost," said Aaron Trachtenberg, an internal medicine resident at the University of Calgary and one of the authors of the analysis. "We're simply asking questions around cost from a systems level, the same way that any large-scale intervention that is going to potentially be paid for by the health-care system should be examined."

Dr. Trachtenberg and his co-author, Braden Manns, a nephrologist and health economist also at the University of Calgary, first set out to quantify the direct costs to the public purse of offering MAID.

Bill C-14, the assisted-dying law that Parliament adopted last June, requires that two physicians assess patients to determine if they qualify for MAID.

Story continues below advertisement

So the authors, using Ontario physician billing codes, added up the cost of two assessments and the cost of paying a doctor to administer a lethal cocktail of drugs. Then, they factored in the price of the drugs, relying on Alberta's suggested regimen of four medications, and the cost of a pharmacist's time to prepare the medications.

They created a high-cost scenario where specialists were required to assess the patient and the most-expensive drugs were used, and a low-cost scenario where family doctors assessed the patient and chose the cheapest drugs.

Drs. Trachtenberg and Manns also assumed that for every patient granted an assisted death, another two would be assessed but not receive MAID.

The grand total? Depending on how many people choose MAID, somewhere between $1.5-million and $14.8-million a year.

Those figures pale in comparison to the savings that could be had if people choose assisted dying over spending the last weeks or months of their lives in hospitals, relying on expensive medical interventions.

By analyzing a slew of factors – including how long patients might otherwise live, what disease they have and, crucially, what percentage of deaths every year are medically assisted – the authors estimate that MAID could reduce costs to the public health-care system by between $34.7-million and $138.8-million annually.

Story continues below advertisement

The potential savings are significant, even if the baseline scenario is palliative care in the home, which tends to be less expensive than dying in a hospital, the authors conclude.

Peter Tanuseputro, a physician-scientist at the Bruyère Research Institute and the Ottawa Hospital, said that this effort to quantify MAID should serve as a reminder that the Canadian health-care system must offer better palliative care, especially at home.

"When we talk about MAID and end-of-life care, I think we need to quickly move on to discuss the need to improve palliative care because the two are very related," he said. "If we provide good palliative care, I think the consensus out there is that many requests for MAID could be avoided completely."

Dr. Tanuseputro provided some of the data for the new analysis, but did not have a hand in writing it.

He did, however, write a commentary that appeared alongside the MAID-cost research in the CMAJ, advocating for improved palliative care as a way to lessen patients' suffering and their need for assisted dying.

Shanaaz Gokool, the chief executive officer of the advocacy group Dying with Dignity, took issue with the fact that some of the paper's assumptions were based on data from the Netherlands and Belgium, where the eligibility criteria for assisted dying are looser than they are in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

"I think the analysis is very premature and it's highly speculative in many ways because there are so many underlying differences in how MAID is practised, especially in the Netherlands," she said. "I think it's very difficult to really know one way or another. I think when you're talking about raw costs, they distract in some ways from the real challenges people are having accessing MAID."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies