Skip to main content

The NDP filed an FOI application seeking ‘all government records that make reference to the issue of missing women along Highway 16/the Highway of Tears.’

John Lehmann/The Globe and Mail

What does the British Columbia government have to hide about the Highway of Tears?

That question was left hanging last week when Elizabeth Denham, the Information and Privacy Commissioner for the province, issued a scathing report that found the government had "triple deleted" e-mails related to the topic.

Ms. Denham found the government had violated the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act by deleting files, and asked the RCMP to investigate one official for his "failure to tell the truth under oath."

Story continues below advertisement

On the weekend, Premier Christy Clark called on government ministers and political staff to stop deleting e-mails, and promised to make the changes recommended in Ms. Denham's report.

Who triggered the investigation?

In May, Ms. Denham's office received a letter from Tim Duncan, a former executive assistant to Transportation Minister Todd Stone, complaining that a ministerial assistant, George Gretes, had willfully destroyed records.

Mr. Duncan testified that in response to an FOI request, he had been asked to search his records for any files related to missing women and the Highway of Tears. But when he told his work colleague, Mr. Gretes, that he had found such files, he was ordered to delete them. When he hesitated, he said, Mr. Gretes took his keyboard and "triple deleted" all of the e-mails related to the Highway of Tears. That was denied by Mr. Gretes, who resigned his job last week.

What motivated the complaint?

Mr. Duncan has told the media his father was murdered in a domestic incident and so he had great sympathy for the families of Highway of Tears victims. He filed his complaint after leaving his job with the B.C. government.

Who filed the FOI application that Mr. Duncan was responding to and how did it relate to the missing women?

Story continues below advertisement

On Nov. 19, 2014, the NDP filed an FOI application seeking "all government records that make reference to the issue of missing women along Highway 16/the Highway of Tears and specifically including records related to meetings held by the ministry on this issue … [from] May 15 to November 19, 2014."

Why did the NDP suspect there were such government records?

On Nov. 17, 2014, parliamentary secretary Darryl Plecas stated in the B.C. Legislature that "in June and July of this year, staff at the Transportation Ministry travelled along Highway 16 corridor and held face-to-face discussions with over 80 communities. They met with 12 First Nations. They spoke with 13 different municipalities and regional districts."

What records did the FOI request produce?

Surprisingly, despite the numerous meetings, the government responded to the FOI request by saying there were no records related to the subject of missing women on the Highway of Tears.

Why did the government send a team to tour Highway 16 in the first place?

Story continues below advertisement

Hitchhiking on the Highway of Tears has long been a risky practice followed by aboriginal women who have few other options because of poverty and limited public transportation. The Transportation Ministry went to meet community leaders along the route to discuss possible solutions to provide safer ways to travel.

At the time, the government was under pressure to do something about the growing number of mostly aboriginal women who had vanished or been murdered while hitchhiking along the 720-kilometre stretch of highway.

In 2006, a report had recommended the government set up a shuttle-bus service along the route. That never happened, however, and the government was being pushed to act.

Why didn't the government follow up on the meetings with substantive action?

That question remains unanswered, and the e-mails that might have shed some light on the topic have been erased.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter