Skip to main content

Justin Bourque is shown in an artist's sketch at his sentencing hearing at Moncton Law Courts on Oct. 28, 2014.

CAROL TAYLOR/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Justin Bourque was sentenced to life in prison on Friday with no chance of parole for 75 years for killing three RCMP officers and wounding two others in a shooting rampage that terrified residents and locked down this New Brunswick city last June.

The sentence makes legal history as the harshest punishment imposed since the last hanging in Canada in 1962.

Justice David Smith of the Court of Queen's Bench called Mr. Bourque's actions "so horrific" and "one of the most heinous crimes in Canadian history."

Story continues below advertisement

He noted that Mr. Bourque purposely targeted police officers because he was motivated by hatred of the authority they represented – and he was obsessed with guns, heavy metal music and video games.

The judge felt that Mr. Bourque showed little remorse for killing Constables Larche, 40, Dave Ross, 32, and Fabrice Gevaudan, 45, and injuring Constables Eric Dubois and Darlene Goguen.

"The offender did not stop and throw down his firearms until some 28 hours after the shooting spree began," Justice Smith said. "He only stopped because he was thirsty and tired and outgunned."

Mr. Bourque showed no emotion as the sentence was read. The courtroom was packed with police officers and family members; they were quiet as the verdict was delivered.

The emotion came afterward when Nadine Larche, Rachael Ross and Angela Gevaudan, the wives of the three slain officers, read statements.

"My dear Doug, I spent the 17 happiest years of my life with you," Ms. Larche said. "It is now time to start the healing process as we piece our lives together as best we can."

Ms. Gevaudan said she is choosing not to "give any space" to feeling anger, resentment or hate toward anyone. "I understand that if I did, I would only be contributing to the driving forces behind these kinds of acts," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

The sentence will not bring back their husbands but will save their children from being "subjected to coming to parole hearings," added Ms. Larche, who has three daughters. Ms. Ross has two sons and Ms. Gevaudan has a daughter.

RCMP Assistant Commissioner Roger Brown, the commanding officer in New Brunswick, believes that the ruling will act as a "deterrent."

The new law brought in by the Conservative government in 2011 allows for a judge to impose consecutive parole ineligibility periods for multiple murderers. It is the second time it has been used. Last year, an Alberta man was sentenced to 40 years for multiple murders.

Justice Smith's decision means that Mr. Bourque, 24, will be 99 – if he lives that long – before he can apply to get out of prison. It is not known if he will try to appeal.

The Crown had asked for the maximum sentence; the defence had asked for 50 years.

Mr. Bourque's lawyer, David Lutz, said his client was "resigned" to the sentence – and had believed since he pleaded guilty last August, that is what he would get.

Story continues below advertisement

"Given all the law, given all the facts it was the sentence that the judge had no choice but to make," Mr. Lutz said, adding that the judge had little latitude given the way the legislation is written.

Some in the legal community believe that the new law is ripe for a challenge under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms section dealing with cruel and unusual punishment, but Mr. Lutz does not. "The legislation was put there for a purpose and that's the purpose," he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter