Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Ontario Provincial Conservative Leader Patrick Brown answers questions from the media in Toronto on Sept. 12, 2016.

Peter Power/The Canadian Press

Questions about his role in a sex-ed controversy continue to dog Patrick Brown as new information appears to suggest the Progressive Conservative leader was aware of a promise his party would scrap the updated curriculum.

The Canadian Press has obtained an email in which Brown's chief of staff wrote the party leader "was prepared to make" a statement that a PC government would bring in a new sex-ed curriculum.

Read more: What the U-turn on sex-ed says about Patrick Brown

Story continues below advertisement

The email – from Nicolas Pappalardo – is dated eight days before Brown has said he became aware of a letter making the same promise.

Brown's office would not comment on the latest developments, but the PC leader has previously said he did not see the letter before it was distributed in an east Toronto riding during a recent byelection.

He's also said that he was "livid" when he first saw it because it did not reflect his opinion.

Brown initially said the letter had been distributed by the PC campaign office in the riding, but a previous email obtained by The Canadian Press showed Brown's chief of staff was involved in the distribution of the letter.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies