Skip to main content

In this July 6, 2013 file photo, smoke rises from railway cars carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac-Megantic, Quebec.

Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press

A lawyer for the defunct railroad at the center of the Lac-Megantic train derailment said Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. is acting deplorably and offensively by attempting to shut down proceedings to distribute over $430 million to victims and creditors of the 2013 tragedy.

Patrice Benoit told Quebec Superior Court Justice Gaetan Dumas on Monday if he accepts arguments by the railway, the settlement fund for victims of the train disaster "and everything else we did for two years would end in failure."

At least two dozen lawyers are attending the hearing Monday in a large courtroom in Sherbrooke, Que.

Story continues below advertisement

Most of the 25 companies accused of responsibility in the July 6, 2013 train derailment in Lac-Megantic, Que. that killed 47 people, agreed to pay money into a settlement fund.

The $431.5 million offer was accepted unanimously by creditors and victims on June 8.

Canadian Pacific is the only company accused in the tragedy that has refused to participate in the fund and argued Monday the current settlement process is illegitimate.

Their lawyer, Andre Durocher, told the court bankruptcy proceedings should not have been authorized in the first place because Montreal Maine and Atlantic Railway Ltd., the rail company that owned the train that derailed, was under Federal Court jurisdiction.

"(Bankruptcy laws) are black and white," Durocher said. "The laws exclude banks and railroad companies," from provincial insolvency proceedings, he said.

MMA didn't have enough insurance to pay damages to victims and creditors, so it filed for bankruptcy in the U.S. and Canada. As part of the insolvency proceedings, MMA — as well as the other companies accused in the derailment — are offering money to victims in exchange for releases from liability.

The $431.5 million settlement fund is tied to the insolvency case currently before the Quebec Superior Court.

Story continues below advertisement

Benoit told the judge that Canadian Pacific has been involved in the bankruptcy proceedings in Quebec for almost two years and for the railway company to object now is "deplorable."

"I can't imagine a worse example of laying in the weeds for almost two years without saying anything," Benoit said.

He added that Dumas has ruled on roughly 40 motions since the start of the proceedings and Canadian Pacific only voiced its objection to the jurisdiction of the court recently.

Durocher countered the company is within its legal rights to call the competency of the court into question as it only recognized recently its rights would be infringed.

While Canadian Pacific doesn't dispute that families of the victims deserve compensation, the company argues it is not one of the companies responsible for what happened when a runaway train owned by now-defunct MMA derailed and exploded in Lac-Megantic's downtown.

They also intend to argue that by freeing other firms of legal liability, it won't be able to counter-sue them if those companies decided to take Canadian Pacific to court to recoup the settlement sums they gave.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm a little disappointed by the way CP has handled this proceeding," said Jeff Orenstein, a lawyer with the Consumer Law Group, who launched a class-action lawsuit against the 25 companies.

"(CP has) taken the position they aren't going to enter into (the settlement fund) and to go further now they are contesting the plan. We aren't necessarily pleased," he said.

Orenstein's lawsuit against the 25 companies has been put on hold pending the approval of the settlement fund.

If the fund is approved, all the companies who have contributed money to the settlement fund will be released permanently from his lawsuit.

Dumas is scheduled to hear arguments for and against the settlement fund on Wednesday and then rule at a later date.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter