Skip to main content

The International Olympic Committee would spurn a women's ski-jumping event at the 2010 Olympics, no matter what the courts decide, according to Canadian IOC delegate Dick Pound.

An elite group of international women ski jumpers is suing Vancouver Olympic organizers (VANOC) over the IOC's decision to exclude them from the Games, arguing that it violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

But Mr. Pound said yesterday that a legal victory by the women would not change anything as far as the IOC is concerned. The Olympic governing body would still not recognize women's ski jumping as an Olympic event or hand out medals should a competition actually take place, he affirmed.

Story continues below advertisement

"The Canadian courts don't decide what Olympic events are going to take place. The women ski jumpers are not ready, on technical grounds, to be included [in the Olympics] and that's an IOC decision," said Mr. Pound, in a telephone interview from Copenhagen where he is attending an IOC congress.

The ski jumpers argue that their exclusion from the Games, while male ski jumpers have been part of the Olympics since 1924, is discrimination that violates their Charter rights.

An earlier court ruling agreed that the IOC decision to keep them from the Games was indeed discrimination, but concluded that the Switzerland-based institution was beyond the reach of the Charter. The appeal of the verdict is scheduled to be heard Nov. 12.

The women ski jumpers' lawyer, Ross Clark, lashed out at Mr. Pound's remarks.

"This is Canada. This is our country. We have a Constitution that is supposed to set standards under which we govern ourselves," said Mr. Clark. "We never agreed to throw our Constitution out the window [for the Olympics]"

He said the women are not asking the courts to order VANOC to stage an Olympic event for them. They are seeking a declaration that their exclusion is illegal under the Charter. It is then up to VANOC to decide how to comply with the law, Mr. Clark explained. One way, he suggested, is to cancel the three men's ski-jumping events so that both men and women are treated equally.

"If you are going to host men's ski jumping, then you have to host it for the women. Otherwise, you can't host ski-jumping at all," Mr. Clark contended.

Story continues below advertisement

"Because you can't do it in a non-discriminatory manner."

Mr. Pound called that "a total strategic error ... to say, 'I we're not in, someone has to be out.'' He added that VANOC has no power to do anything, no matter what the courts finally decide.

"VANOC has agreed to put on a program that is determined by the IOC. Do you think local organizers should be telling the IOC what they should be doing? It would be like VANOC saying to the IOC, 'We think ringette should be in.' ... The IOC is simply not a party to this action."

He added that a legal victory by the women ski jumpers could wreck any chance of Canada holding future big international sporting events, such as the Olympics.

"Can you imagine anyone putting one on, and having the courts in Canada telling you what events you have to hold, and if you don't have women, you're going to have to take off the men. Why would they go there?"

Ski jumpers involved in the court case said they were perturbed by what Mr. Pound had to say.

Story continues below advertisement

"As a Canadian, I'm startled. He is putting the IOC ahead of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms," said 16-year Meaghan Reid, who has been ski jumping for five years.

"His attitude kind of shows what we're up against, and why we decided to launch our lawsuit in the first place."

Zoya Lynch, 18, who remains part of the lawsuit though she is currently on a break from ski jumping, said she feels embarrassed for Mr. Pound "as a Canadian. It's really insulting to us. ."

The women ski jumper's quest to compete at the Olympics has become a bit of a cause célèbre, garnering widespread public and political support, with several documentaries on their fight in the works.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies