Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Former Quebec radio host Andre Arthur, who is an Independent MP in Portneuf-Jacques Cartier.

Clement Allard/The Canadian Press

The Supreme Court of Canada has rejected a defamation class-action lawsuit launched by a group of Haitian and Arab taxi drivers stung by disparaging remarks made by a Montreal talk-show host-turned politician.

In an 8-1 ruling Thursday morning, the court said "shock jock" André Arthur's right to vent his spleen and use racial epithets trumped an attempt to gain compensation by 1,110 cab drivers who were humiliated by his diatribe.

While Mr. Arthur - who is now an Independent MP in the riding of Portneuf-Jacques Cartier - had gone over the top by holding an entire group up to ridicule, the court said, any reasonable person would recognize that he was expressing a personal view that could not sensibly apply to each cab driver.

Story continues below advertisement

"An ordinary person, while sensitive to such excessive remarks, would not in my view have formed a less favourable opinion of each Arab or Haitian taxi driver, considered individually," Madam Justice Marie Deschamps wrote for the majority. "I therefore conclude that Mr. Arthur's comments, while wrongful, did not damage the reputation of each Montreal taxi driver whose mother tongue is Arabic or Creole."

The dissenting judge, Madam Justice Rosalie Abella, argued that society cannot turn a blind eye to calculated, group defamations, and that the drivers suffered a compensable injury.

"These were highly stigmatizing remarks attacking members of vulnerable communities," Judge Abella said. "There is a difference between provocation or controversy, including offensive statements, and statements that deliberately vilify vulnerable people.

"The group was defined with sufficient precision and the statements specific enough to be harmful to the reputations of each of its members," she said. "The members of the group Mr. Arthur vilified interact with the public on a daily basis and their livelihoods depend upon their ability to attract customers."

Mr. Arthur made his comments on a morning show on Nov. 17, 1998, on CKVL radio station, which is operated by Diffusion Métromédia CMR Inc. The topic for the show was whether Quebeckers were satisfied with restaurants and hotels, particularly in Montreal.

Mr. Arthur's diatribe, delivered in French, included racial slurs against Haitians and Arabs: "Why is it that there are so many incompetent people and that the language of work is Creole or Arabic in a city that's French and English? … Taxis have really become the Third World of public transportation in Montreal. … My suspicion is that the exams, well, they can be bought. You can't have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams."

A Quebec Superior Court judge earlier awarded the drivers $220,000 for defamation; however, the Quebec Court of Appeal reversed the decision.

Story continues below advertisement

The Supreme Court majority made no apology this morning for Mr. Arthur's allegations that Creole and Arab cab-drivers were ruining the reputation of Montreal's taxi fleet.

"Mr. Arthur made accusations of uncleanliness, arrogance, incompetence, corruption and ignorance of official languages," Judge Deschamps said. "By referring to Creole as speaking 'nigger,' he disparaged and expressed contempt for the language primarily used by Haitians to communicate with one another. … As well, when he called drivers of Arab origin 'fakirs', he made fun of and even ridiculed them."

Canadian society, Judge Deschamps said, has expanded its view of what individuals are free to state, and an ordinary person listening to the show would have recognized that they were excessive, irrational generalizations based on a single, unpleasant experience Mr. Arthur had had.

"An ordinary person would not have believed the offensive allegations and would not have thought that Mr. Arthur was vouching for the validity of his racist and contemptuous insults," Judge Deschamps said. "An ordinary person certainly would not have associated the allegations of ignorance, incompetence, uncleanliness, arrogance and corruption with each taxi driver whose mother tongue is Arabic or Creole personally. … The drivers' personal reputations remained intact in the eyes of the ordinary person."

She also reasoned that Mr. Arthur's reputation as an intolerant polemicist was a factor.

"Mr. Arthur was a known polemicist in the area where his show was broadcast," Judge Deschamps said. "He had become known for his distasteful and provocative language. The radio show during which the impugned comments were broadcast had a satirical style and tried to sensationalize things.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is not intended as a value judgment on shock-jock radio, but the context of such shows does have an impact on the real effect of comments made on them," the continued. "People cannot of course use their general tendency to speak in bad taste as an excuse to defame others on air, but it must be acknowledged that comments made by Mr. Arthur in such a context have very little plausibility from the point of view of the ordinary person."

Judge Abella disagreed strongly, saying Mr. Arthur should not get a free ride simply because he is habitually mean-spirited and intolerant.

"I do not accept that his listeners would have inevitably treated Mr. Arthur's statements as less plausible because of his reputation," she said. "I appreciate that Mr. Arthur was not averse to comments of a provocative nature, and that his listeners knew that he was given occasionally to making offensive statements. But I do not accept that Mr. Arthur's comments would necessarily be seen to be hyperbolic by the ordinary person. They were made 'seriously,' not satirically or ironically."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies