Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

In this Jan. 11, 2011 file photo, the Skype logo is reflected in the eye of a reader using a handheld smartphone, in Berlin, Germany.

Faced with increasing costs and delays associated with hearing cases, a growing number of judges are trying to drag the court system into the electronic age, including using video links to allow witnesses to testify from afar.

Legal traditionalists are aghast at the prospect of cross-examining witnesses via video, but others believe the new moves will enhance justice and keep the courts credible and accessible.

"The legal system is going to be exposed to ridicule if we don't move forward with innovative ways of taking evidence," said Brian Gover, a veteran Toronto lawyer at Stockwoods LLP. "One of the great issues for us in a time of austerity is going to be cost control and delivering justice in an efficient way. Technology has provided an answer to the problem."

Story continues below advertisement

Two recent rulings broke new ground, opening the door to testimony by Skype and teleconferencing.

The first case involved a witness in a child custody case, Linda Veronica Paiva, who said she could not afford to travel to Toronto from her home in Denmark to testify. Family lawyer Phil Epstein persuaded Madam Justice Ellen Murray of the Ontario Superior Court to allow her to testify via Skype.

"Skype is now in HD and has an internal automatic checking system," Mr. Epstein said in an interview. "You can see people in the courtroom and they can see you. This is clearly the way of the future."

In the second case, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned aggravated assault convictions against two alleged Asian gang members. It criticized their trial judge for not exploring the feasibility of letting a key Crown witness testify and be cross-examined by teleconference from Singapore.

The two rulings exposed a sharp division of opinion within the legal profession. While lawyers such as Mr. Gover see technology as a way to relieve pressure on a fraying court system, critics insist that only in-court testimony can permit judges and juries to properly observe a witness's demeanour.

Steven Benmor, a lawyer who represents Ms. Paiva's estranged husband, Michael Corpening, said the Skype arrangement approved by Judge Murray threatens the integrity of testimony.

"The very nature of the right to trial is to allow a judge to see, hear and experience a witness's demeanour so as to assess not only the answers but 'how' they are delivered," Mr. Benmor said in an interview. "If demeanour were not important, we would have trials by affidavits and paper records."

Story continues below advertisement

He said that family law cases involve highly nuanced questions about the quality of parenting, the ability of a parent to meet the child's needs and the reasons one parent wants to limit the other parent's access to a child.

"Skype and other technological advances in communication are applauded, but do not replace the need for a judge to look the person in the eye and 'judge' them," he said. Mr. Benmor also worries that use of such technology will impede settlements, which frequently benefit from the dynamics of having all parties in the same room.

Mr. Gover said that what critics are missing is a growing realization that analyzing an individual's demeanour is a poor way to judge honesty. Wrongful convictions have frequently been rooted in erroneous conclusions a judge or jury drew from a defendant's voice and body language, he said.

In fact, legislation permitting the use of video technology has been on the books for several years, but few lawyers and judges were willing to explore it.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies