Skip to main content

Former Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro talks to media as he leaves court in Peterborough Ont., Jan. 27, 2015.Fred Thornhill/The Canadian Press

Former Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro lost his appeal of his election overspending case and was taken away to jail Tuesday, after an Ontario judge found he had committed offences that "strike at the heart" of the democratic process. Mr. Del Mastro was convicted in the fall of 2014 for violating the Canada Elections Act during the 2008 election and was sentenced last summer to a month in jail.

He was granted bail after a night behind bars as he launched an appeal, with his lawyer arguing for no time in jail while Crown prosecutors pushed for a longer incarceration period.

Justice Bryan Shaughnessy, who heard Mr. Del Mastro's appeal in Oshawa, Ont., found that the judge at the disgraced politician's original trial made no significant errors in her findings.

"The appeal as against conviction is dismissed," he said in court. "The appeal as to sentence is dismissed. Dean Del Mastro shall be taken into custody, immediately, to serve the balance of his sentence."

Mr. Del Mastro's lawyer, Leo Adler, said he was disappointed with Justice Shaughnessy's decision and would be "reviewing all options."

Mr. Del Mastro – former prime minister Stephen Harper's one-time point man on defending the Tories against allegations of electoral fraud – was convicted of three electoral offences: overspending, failing to report a personal contribution of $21,000 he made to his own campaign and filing a false report.

He resigned from his Peterborough, Ont., seat in the House of Commons – where he had been sitting as an Independent since being charged – shortly after he was found guilty, although he maintained his innocence throughout his legal saga.

Justice Shaughnessy, however, found that Mr. Del Mastro's offences were grave ones.

"Violations of the election spending limits and deliberate and concerted efforts to evade compliance with the honest and truthful reporting of contributions and expenses, such as occurred in this case, is a serious affront to our democratic system of government and fairness of our election process," he said.

"The offences that Dean Del Mastro committed … are serious and do strike at the heart of our democratic electoral process."

Much of Mr. Del Mastro's case pitted his own testimony against that of the president of a now-defunct data consulting firm called Holinshed, whose services lay at the centre of the trial.

Mr. Del Mastro's defence took the position that Holinshed's president, Frank Hall, was lying to the court about the nature of the work he had done for Mr. Del Mastro during the 2008 campaign period.

During the trial, Mr. Del Mastro denied Mr. Hall's claim that Holinshed provided hundreds of hours of voter-ID calling for his 2008 campaign – a claim that was supported by e-mails between Mr. Hall and Mr. Del Mastro that were found on Mr. Hall's computer by investigators.

Mr. Del Mastro testified that he had rebuffed Mr. Hall's efforts to get him to buy Holinshed's voter ID services, and denied ever receiving or sending the e-mails in question.

The trial judge accepted Mr. Hall's evidence that his firm was working for Mr. Del Mastro during the election period and found there had been no evidence of tampering with electronic data.

She concluded at trial that Mr. Del Mastro had lied and cheated and his conduct had been an affront to democracy.

Report an error