Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Professors sign letter criticizing Queen's University

Queen's Universityin Kingston, Ont.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Professors at Queen's University have written an open letter apologizing to former adjunct history professor Michael Mason over the school's handling of accusations that he used racist and sexist language while teaching last year.

The letter follows a September report from the Canadian Association of University Teachers alleging Queen's administrators acted "callously and irresponsibly" and violated Prof. Mason's academic freedom in the way it addressed complaints from students and teaching assistants about remarks he made inside and outside the classroom.

Queen's administrators have disputed the CAUT's findings, and have declined to apologize to Prof. Mason, as the report recommends. In response, several Queen's professors penned the open letter, released to the media on Monday, that claims the school's administration "cannot and does not represent Queen's," and that is signed by 150 members of the Queen's community so far.

Story continues below advertisement

"Queen's consists of Queen's academic staff, Queen's non-academic staff, Queen's alumni, and Queen's students. As Queen's University, authorizing ourselves as per article 14.6 of the Collective Agreement, WE apologize to you, Professor Mason," the letter concludes.

Prof. Mason, who has 40 years' experience teaching at universities, says he was quoting the words of others from historical documents when he used racial epithets and that he did so to illustrate and criticize widespread racism after the Second World War. He also said a remark that he hoped students would become "masters and mistresses" of the course material wasn't intended to be sexist.

The CAUT report claims Queen's made procedural mistakes in questioning Prof. Mason about the allegations without advance warning and without advising him of his right to seek advice from the Queen's University Faculty Association, which has since endorsed CAUT's conclusions.

Queen's maintains its response is bound by confidentiality rules, but principal Daniel Woolf said in a statement Monday that CAUT's findings "are incomplete, inaccurate, and based on a portion of the facts in this case."

"Academic freedom is of the utmost importance to Queen's University," Dr. Woolf said. "However, this is fundamentally not about academic freedom. It is about behaviour in the classroom that was reported to have created a hostile and unsafe learning environment for students."

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Banking Reporter

James Bradshaw is banking reporter for the Report on Business. He covered media from 2014 to 2016, and higher education from 2010 to 2014. Prior to that, he worked as a cultural reporter for Globe Arts, and has written for both the Toronto section and the editorial page. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨