Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Ontario students should not have to choose between so-called applied and academic programs at the start of high school, an education lobby group said in a report released Monday.

People for Education said research it has done, as well as past studies by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, suggest splitting students into separate streams contributes to lacklustre grades for those from lower income families.

"Dividing students in this way has only exacerbated inequality," Annie Kidder, the executive director of People for Education said in an interview. Students starting in Grade 9 must choose either applied courses, which focus on essential concepts and practical applications, or the academic stream, which employs theory and abstract problems.

Story continues below advertisement

People for Education's report said Ontario students who opted for applied courses fared notably worse than those in academic courses in terms of test scores, graduation and postsecondary enrolment. It based its findings, in part, on a survey of some 241 high schools, about a quarter of secondary schools in Ontario.

For example it cited a finding by the Toronto District School Board that 88 per cent of students in academic math in Grade 9 go on to graduate, compared to only 59 per cent in the applied course.

The report's conclusions mirror global findings from the OECD, which has suggested a number of possible reasons for the results. They include lower expectations from both teachers and students, slower-paced and more fragmented instructions, a lower quality learning experience, stigmatization, and a decrease in self-esteem.

The OECD has advised education systems to defer making students choose between the two streams until the late high school years.

Over the next two weeks, many Grade 8 students in Ontario will be choosing between taking "hands-on" applied courses or "theoretical and abstract" academic courses as their core subjects for Grade 9.

However it's unclear if students and their families are really getting all the information they need to understand the long-term implications of their choices, Kidder said.

"Those decisions are going to have an impact on their choices all the way through school, maybe even after they graduate – or in some cases, if they graduate," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

In almost all cases in Ontario, students in applied courses study a different curriculum than those in academic courses. They are also in different classrooms with different teachers, according to the report.

Naomi Tejada and Norlan Quintanilla, a Mississauga couple who are both college graduates, said they have selected the applied stream for their 13-year-old son.

"I sat down with my son and told him that we have chosen all applied but that doesn't mean anything. We don't make a big deal out of that," Tejada said.

"It's a new environment for him, so we want him to start off with a less demanding workload," she said, adding that to her, that's the only difference between applied and academic.

Tejada says her plan is to later transfer her son to academic because they believe he can do it.

"We want him to be challenged and to go to university," she said in a phone interview.

Story continues below advertisement

Suzy Marasigan, a Brampton mother of two children, isn't sold on the notion of later streaming.

She opted for the academic stream for her 13-year-old daughter, as she did for her son who is now at Queen's University.

But university was a struggle initially for her son, said Marasigan, who wonders if it would have been even tougher for him if streaming had been put off until the later grades.

"I'm afraid it might make the curriculum too easy and harder for kids when they go to university," Marasigan said in a phone interview.

Education Minister Liz Sandals didn't address People For Education's call for later streaming, but in an emailed statement she acknowledged an achievement gap. She said the province would make resources available to more schools to help address the problem.

Ontario's graduation rates have increased from 68 per cent in 2003 to 83 per cent in 2012, she noted.

Story continues below advertisement

"We're confident we can build on the progress we have achieved and help our students reach new heights," she said.

Canadian Press

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies