Skip to main content

Trustees exist for school boards, and school boards exist for children and for young adults. Their policies and actions specifically affect students under the age of 18 but, unfortunately, it is only parents who have the luxury of deciding who will make these decisions. This should change: Municipalities should give students aged 16 and older the right to vote for school board trustee.

I have always believed that education should be a partnership between educators, parents, and students. In an attempt to develop and play an active role in this "partnership," I became involved in student leadership by discussing current issues in education at local meetings at age 14, and I was elected as a student trustee on the Toronto District School Board , a role that I held for two terms, at age 16.

And while I, and many student leaders before me, did all that we could to engage young people in the decision-making process, few saw the merit of being involved due to the ageist culture that exists in public policy today. In essence, there is the belief that "if you are too young to vote, you are too young to be heard."

Story continues below advertisement

Lowering the voting age for trustee elections is the first step in increasing youth citizenship and reducing youth apathy – and it makes the most sense, too. Unlike provincial or federal politics, educational politics affect all students under the age of 18, and their opinions are invaluable. Students are the only ones who can say, with conviction, what works and what does not in their classrooms. When it comes to policy, they know what would benefit their learning experience, and when it comes to trustees, they should know who would benefit their learning experience.

A trustee, like any politician, always has election or re-election at the back of his or her mind, and students can take advantage of this. If students were given the right to vote for their trustee, discussions in the boardroom would more significantly reflect the needs and concerns of the individuals actually in the classroom, as trustees would be politically obligated to work for the best interests of students, and not just those of parents.

Where we would see the real impact of a youth vote is where there exists a difference of opinion between parents and students. To name a few examples, this means a greater emphasis placed on fairly modern educational concepts, such as technology in our classrooms, as well as introduction and expansion of specialized programs, such as those in the fields of arts or sciences, simply because it is the students who see the true value.

Recently, the city council of Takoma Park, Md., voted to lower the municipal voting age to 16, becoming the first American city to do so – and this is not a foreign concept in Canada. In 2005, former Ontario Liberal MP Mark Holland tabled a private member's bill to lower the voting age for federal elections in Canada to 16, keeping the minimum age of candidates at 18. Though the Bill did not pass, it formalized the concept and started a national conversation.

Both these motions were based on the premise that, given the right to vote, high-school students would become as, if not more, knowledgeable about local candidates and their platforms as their parents. With most youth having direct access to the Internet, they can readily see and read about all there is to know about a candidate, and with a direct stake in the outcome of the election, they would make an informed choice.

In fact, Student Vote, a not-for-profit organization that holds mock elections in elementary and high schools, has data to prove that students would make this informed choice. Before the last federal election, 563,000 students under the age of 18 across the country casted their mock -ballots in this program and elected a Conservative minority with an NDP official opposition – a result that is almost identical to that of the actual election.

The question we must ask ourselves is this: If disenfranchised youth were given the right to vote in the trustee elections, would they vote in accordance with their adult counterparts, or would they influence the final outcome of the vote? We will not know until we give students this opportunity.

Story continues below advertisement

There is also a larger issue at hand. As a system, we encourage youth independence and civic engagement. Unfortunately, we have an uninteresting, impractical mandated civics course in grade 10 that needs reform, while voter turnout rates for those aged 18-24 have been low in recent history. Lowering the voting age for trustee would give much more value to the teachings of civics class, and would send an important message to all youth about the value of civic engagement.

Today, I am 18 years old. I have recently graduated from high school and, though the election will no longer affect me, I have now been granted the right to vote for trustee. To me, this is very ironic. If you agree, it is time to do something about it.

Hirad Zafari is the President of the Ontario Student Trustees' Association, and a student trustee of the Toronto District School Board

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter