Skip to main content

The stroller wars are heating up.

The debate over plus-sized prams, already contentious and the cause of bans and boycotts, is moving into the legal realm. A Halifax man filed a human-rights complaint on Friday to assert his right to use the bus with his young twins and their stroller.

Mohammad Ehsan says Metro Transit's policy of allowing drivers to determine whether to allow larger strollers on buses leaves parents vulnerable to second-class treatment.

Story continues below advertisement

On Jan. 2, a driver told Mr. Ehsan and his wife that they could not ride a city bus with the stroller. He said he complained to Metro Transit officials, but his concerns were brushed off, leading him to file with the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.

Metro Transit spokeswoman Lori Patterson said Mr. Ehsan and his wife would have been welcome on the bus if they'd been willing to hold their children and fold their stroller. But Mr. Ehsan said he believes that would be an unsafe way to travel.

Metro Transit guidelines allow "smaller" strollers, defined as those up to 105 by 56 centimetres, and asks that babies be carried while on buses. Drivers have explicit authority to prohibit larger strollers.

"Parents take buses with fear because they don't know how they will be treated," said Mr. Ehsan, a PhD student and part-time instructor in the department of political science at Dalhousie University.

"There should not be any rule that limits people's mobility, limits their access to public services because they have a stroller."

Policies on strollers vary among transit services across Canada. Toronto and Winnipeg allow any that will fit on board. Vancouver permits strollers smaller than 120 by 60 centimetres, provided there is space.

Attitudes appear to be hardening on both sides of the stroller issue. Many stores prohibit large prams, raising the ire of parents who deem this "anti-baby" behaviour. But proponents of restrictions say SUV-style strollers are too big to navigate tight or crowded conditions.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Patterson said Metro Transit has received numerous complaints about strollers causing inconvenience. She said transit officials investigated Mr. Ehsan's initial complaint and found the driver acted within his authority.

"A bus is a fairly confined space and we're trying to be all things to all people," she said. "We've had quite a few calls saying, 'I travel the bus and I see strollers and they're a hassle, I have to climb over them.'"

Mr. Ehsan acknowledges that his family's stroller is slightly larger in one dimension than the Metro Transit guidelines, measuring 115 by 49 centimetres. But he says that, with six-month-old twin boys and no car, transit is the only option.

Mr. Ehsan said he was treated rudely by the driver in the Jan. 2 incident. He said that after he complained, supervisors told him that the bus, which was largely empty at the time, could have become crowded later on the route.

He went to the local media with his story and the coverage prompted a sharp debate online.

"Good for the driver for not allowing the stroller," said one person posting at the Canadian Public Transit Discussion Board. "Maybe they should go out and buy a less expensive and smaller stroller."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Ehsan insisted he is looking only for an apology and a more flexible policy.

"I'm not seeking compensation, I need changes in the guidelines," he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter