Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A woman receives a flu vaccine shot. Alberta’s health-care inquiry heard testimony Monday that paperwork was fudged and that Calgary Flames players and their families were directed to lie in order to cover up the team receiving fast-tracked pandemic flu shots at a private clinic in 2009.

ROGELIO V. SOLIS/The Associated Press

Alberta's health-care inquiry has heard testimony that paperwork was fudged and that Calgary Flames players and their families were directed to lie to cover up the team receiving fast-tracked pandemic flu shots at a private clinic in 2009.

Calgary health nurse Debbie Hyman says while 150 of the Flames and their loved ones were getting the H1N1 shots in private at the office of team doctor Jim Thorne, hundreds of ordinary Calgarians were cussing, yelling, fainting, and fighting while standing in line for hours for the same shot at public clinics.

"There was a lot of anger [and] hostility," Ms. Hyman told retired Justice John Vertes on Monday, recalling conditions in the early days at the public clinics. "There were times where I felt unsafe. There were times where I felt the staff were being threatened."

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Hyman was one of two nurses who testified about the NHL team getting the shots in late October, 2009, to combat the deadly virus.

Nurse Michelle Bosch testified that Mr. Thorne, whom she knows through her husband, called her on the second day after the vaccinations were released to see what could be done for the Flames. She suggested a private clinic.

Both nurses testified that having the Flames come down to a public clinic would have resulted in a calamitous "sideshow," with people in line calling in the celebrity sighting to their friends and bringing a stampede of fans to their Brentwood facility.

Ms. Hyman said she left a voice message with her direct supervisor asking for a call back if a private vaccination for the team was not allowed. Three days later, after hearing nothing back from her boss, Ms. Hyman and Ms. Bosch took 200 doses over to Mr. Thorne's clinic and administered the vaccine.

Ms. Hyman said while the shots were being distributed, Mr. Thorne was coaching patients on what to say.

"He was the one that was telling people, 'If you are asked, just say that you received your vaccine at Brentwood,' " Ms. Hyman told the inquiry.

"I was really confused," she added.

Story continues below advertisement

"My response to him at that time was, 'Why are you telling people to do that because we have received approval to be here and to do this.'

"He didn't have a response."

In testimony to the inquiry last week, Mr. Thorne said he initially contacted Ms. Bosch out of concern for security if the Flames were to show up at a public clinic.

He testified that when Alberta Health Services told him the private session was okay, he went ahead with it. He was not asked whether he coached the Flames and their families to lie.

Ms. Hyman and Ms. Bosch also testified that the paperwork filled out on the Flames vaccination indicated the shots were given out at Brentwood rather than at Mr. Thorne's office.

They said that was for administrative purposes to make it easier to track a patient's history if he or she had an adverse reaction to the vaccine.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Thorne has testified that he, too, thought, that putting Brentwood on the forms was just clerical minutiae.

However, health vice-president Lori Anderson, who investigated the incident, told the inquiry she didn't believe it.

"It wasn't to trace for adverse reactions," testified Ms. Anderson. "They didn't want it known that they held a private clinic for the Flames."

Ms. Anderson said having the Flames at a public clinic would not have caused turmoil, but would rather have been a shot in the arm for everyone.

"The Flames are great ambassadors. I thought it would actually be good for morale in the lineups to see the Flames lining up like everyone else," she said.

Ms. Anderson said it was made clear to everyone in the system that the vaccine was only to be distributed at four locations. She said other groups, including seniors, were denied getting shots at a private location.

Story continues below advertisement

While Mr. Thorne had initially asked about getting just the team vaccinated, the inquiry heard conflicting versions of how families were pulled into the plan.

Ms. Bosch said she suggested only the 50 or so players and team officials get vaccinated, but that Ms. Hyman came back and said they had 200 doses ready for whoever wanted them.

But Ms. Hyman said it was Ms. Bosch who told her to bring 200 doses to Mr. Thorne's clinic even though Ms. Hyman expected just 50 people to be vaccinated.

She said she was surprised when she saw all the families show up, but vaccinated them anyway because at that point there was no rule on who got priority.

That changed the next day, when a vaccine shortage forced all the clinics to close. They reopened days later with orders only to give an H1N1 shot to high-risk people, such as children.

Within days, word of the private shots leaked out to the media and both the Flames and health officials were delivered a broadside of anger from the public.

Story continues below advertisement

After Ms. Anderson's investigation, both Ms. Hyman and her supervisor were fired. Ms. Anderson told the inquiry the pair displayed "exceedingly poor judgment" by giving the Flames the shots in private, but said the dismissals were about more than that. She didn't elaborate on any of the other reasons.

Ms. Bosch insisted that in the long run it was still better to give the Flames the shots in private.

"If the Flames would have showed up [at the public clinic], the lines would have been slower and less people would have been vaccinated," she said.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies