Skip to main content

Ian Troop, who was TO2015 CEO when this 2012 photo was taken, is trying to clear his name after being fired.

Michelle Siu/The Globe and Mail

The fired former head of the Toronto Pan American Games says his controversial expenses, including a 91-cent parking charge, were simply "the cost of doing business."

Ian Troop, in his first interview since he was ousted in December, 2013, said there are reasonable explanations for all the expenses, which also included dress shirts from Harry Rosen and a wine tour. He also defended his record as TO2015 CEO, saying the organization saved tens of millions of dollars under his leadership by keeping venue construction costs under budget.

Pan Am organizers have written a letter formally exonerating him of any wrongdoing, saying none of his expenses were "improper."

Story continues below advertisement

"You're not putting on the Bobcaygeon summer fair here. This is a major international event with 10,000 athletes and officials," Mr. Troop told The Globe and Mail. "You've got this major discussion around 91 cents, good or bad. And yet the fact we saved $50-million in the Games budget … that barely gets a mention. We've got to have a balance around the fact that while we're chasing the ants, we don't let the ocean liner steam right in front of us."

Mr. Troop said he incurred the parking charge when meeting with a Niagara Region mayor to discuss Pan Am events in the area. He ordered the dress shirts, emblazoned with TO2015's logo, so he and fellow officials could give the Games higher visibility when they went to public events. The $109 wine tour was a social event organized for the spouses of visiting Pan Am officials, part of TO2015's entertainment obligations, he said.

A Pan Am organizers' letter, dated Jan. 29, backs up Mr. Troop's contention: "TO2015 is not aware of any improper expenditures made or authorized by Mr. Troop that violated TO2015 expense policies."

Pan Am chair David Peterson said the organization wrote the letter at Mr. Troop's request after the latter felt he had been unfairly maligned by current Pan Am officials, who have implied that his expenses were inappropriate. Mr. Peterson said Pan Am also believed Mr. Troop might sue them if they didn't issue a clarification.

"People picked up the wrong impression of him, and we wished Ian no ill will. We wanted to clear up to his satisfaction," Mr. Peterson said in an interview.

The issue, he said, was a matter of optics, and Pan Am has subsequently tightened its rules on expenses: "Sometimes these things happen and someone can make you look like a monkey. So you try not to, even if you're not breaking the policies, you try not to make yourself look like a monkey."

When Mr. Troop was fired 14 months ago, government sources said he and Mr. Peterson, who had taken over as Pan Am chair just three months earlier, had clashed behind the scenes.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Troop today says Mr. Peterson ousted him because he wanted to "put his own stamp on things." Mr. Peterson, a former Liberal premier, came in at a time of political volatility, with Premier Kathleen Wynne running a minority government and facing repeated attacks by the Progressive Conservatives over Pan Am spending.

"David brought a very different style, and I think that the real politicization of the Games increased dramatically in a very volatile time of provincial politics," Mr. Troop said. "There was a degree of sensitivity around how these Games were going to be viewed by Ontario and, with a minority government, how they will either help or hurt re-election hopes for Wynne."

He described Mr. Peterson as "demanding," but declined to go into detail.

Mr. Peterson would not offer any specifics on what he and Mr. Troop disagreed on.

"You don't understand because you don't know enough about it," he said. "I'm not going to get into the details of the discussion."

He said Mr. Troop's firing had nothing to do with the expenses scandal.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter